期刊文献+

持续吸入变应原引起支气管哮喘小鼠免疫耐受 被引量:2

Continuous inhalation of allergen induces immunotolerance in a mouse asthma model
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨吸入变应原引起支气管哮喘(简称哮喘)过敏性气道炎症免疫耐受形成的机制。方法BALB/c小鼠60只,按随机数字表法分为实验组(50只)和空白对照组(10只),实验组小鼠先给予腹腔注射卵清白蛋白(OVA)1mg,每周1次,共3周。雾化吸入OVA每天1h(含OVA80μg),连续10d。依据吸入OVA时间分为A、B、C、D、E5组,每组10只。A组雾化吸入10d后处死。B、D组继续每天1次,每次1h,每周5次,分别吸入OVA4周及8周,然后每天1h,连续10d吸入OVA后处死。C组停止吸入OVA4周后再次吸入OVA,每天1h,连续10d后处死。E组每天1次,每次1h,每周5次,吸入OVA4周,停止雾化吸入OVA4周,然后每天1h,连续10d吸入OVA后处死。测定各组小鼠支气管肺泡灌洗液(BALF)中细胞总数,嗜酸粒细胞、淋巴细胞、CD4+、CD8+、CD4+IL-10+分类及BALF中白细胞介素4(IL-4)、γ干扰素(IFN-γ)、IL-10的含量。测定血清中IL-4、IFN-γ、IL-10、OVA、IgE、IgG1、IgG2a水平,并对各组小鼠肺组织病理学进行分析。结果空白对照组BALF中嗜酸粒细胞、B淋巴细胞、CD4+IL-10+细胞分别为0.010±0.000、2.1±1.9、4.9±1.5,A组分别为0.480±0.110、5.1±2.6、5.1±2.3,B组分别为0.120±0.020、8.9±3.6、10.4±3.6,C组分别为0.560±0.050、4.7±1.7、6.3±3.1,D组分别为0.070±0.030、10.1±2.9、12.7±4.5,E组分别为0.680±0.030、5.6±3.2、6.1±3.4,各组间比较差异有统计学意义(F值分别为36.46、31.89、167.89,P均<0.01)。B、D组BALF中CD4+IL-10+细胞数与A组比较差异有统计学意义(q=5.8、6.4,P均<0.05);空白对照组BALF中IL-4、IL-10水平分别为(21±3)pg/ml、(44±12)pg/ml,A组分别为(128±23)pg/ml、(68±18)pg/ml,B组分别为(54±12)pg/ml、(127±27)pg/ml,C组分别为(133±21)pg/ml、(78±17)pg/ml,D组分别为(8±18)pg/ml、(135±34)pg/ml,E组分别为(143±26)pg/ml、(76±15)pg/ml,组间比较差异有统计学意义(F分别为37.20、143.78,P均<0.01)。B、D两组BALF中IL-10水平与A组比较差异有统计学意义(q分别为7.8、9.6,P均<0.05)。结论持续吸入变应原可使小鼠气道炎症减轻,产生免疫耐受,调节T淋巴细胞产生的IL-10参与了耐受形成。 Objective To investigate the mechanism of immunotolerance caused by allergen immunotherapy in allergen-induced asthmatic airway inflammation. Methods Sixty ovalbumin (OVA)-sensitized BALB/c mice were randomly divided into two groups, 50 in the experimental group and 10 in the control group. The mice in the experimental group were treated with 3 injections of ovalbumin intraperitoneally ( 1 mg for each separated for two weeks) and challenged by ovalbumin inhalation 1 h/day for 10 successive days. Then the mice were divided further into group A, group B, group C, group D and E with 10 mice in each group. The mice in group A were sacrificed after 10 day challenge. The mice in group B and D were continuously exposed to inhaled OVA for 4 and 8 weeks ( 1 h/day, 5 days a week), respectively, then to inhaled OVA 1 h/day for 10 successive days. The inhalation was interrupted for 4 weeks in group C after initial challenge and restarted for another 10 days ( 1 h/day) afterwards. The mice in group E were exposed continuously to inhaled OVA for 4 weeks ( 1 h/day, 5 days a week) after initialchallenge, which was interrupted for 4 weeks, and restarted for 10 days ( 1 h/day). Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) was performed, and total cells, EOS inophils, lymphocytes were assessed; CD4^+, CD8^+, CD4^+ IL-10 ^+ cells were determined using flow cytometry, and IL-4, IFN-γ, and IL-10 in the BAL fluid were measured by ELISA. Serum ovalbumin-specific IgE, IL-4, IFN-γ/ and IL-10 were also determined. Pathologic manifestation of the lung was analyzed. Results The percentage of EOS, B lymphocytes, CD4^+ IL-10^+cells in BAL were 0. 010 ±0. 000, 2. 1 ± 1.9 and 4.9± 1.5, respectively in the control group; 0. 480 ±0. 110, 5. 1 ± 2.6 and 5. 1 ± 2.3, respectively, in group A; 0. 120 ± 0.020, 8.9 ±3.6, and 10.4 ± 3.6, respective, in group B ; 0. 560 ± 0. 050, 4. 7 ± 1.7 and 6. 3 ± 3.1, respectively, in group C ; 0. 070 ± 0. 030, 10. 1 ± 2. 9 and 12. 7 ±4. 5, respectively, in group D ; 0. 680 ± 0. 030, 5.6 ± 3.2 and 6. 1 ± 3.4, respectively, in group E. The difference was significant among different groups ( F = 36. 46, 31.89, 167. 89 respectively ; all P 〈0. 01 ). The percentage of CD4^+ IL-10^+ ceils in BAL was increased in group B and group D, which were significantly higher than those in group A (q = 5.8,6.4, P 〈 0. 05 ). The levels of IL-4 and IL-10 in BAL fluid were (21 ±3) pg/ml and (44 ± 12) pg/ml, respectively, in the control group; ( 128 ± 23) pg/ml and (68 ± 18) pg/ml,respectively, in group A; (54 ±12) pg/ml and (127 ±27) pg/ml, respectively, in group B ; ( 133 ± 21 ) pg/ml and (78±17) pg/ml, respectively, in group C ; ( 8 ± 18 ) pg/ ml and (135 ±34) pg/ml, respectively, in group D; (143 ± 26) pg/ml and (76 ± 15) pg/ml, respectively, in group E. The difference was statistically significant among different groups (F = 37.20, 143.78 respectively; all P 〈0. 01 ). The levels of IL-10 in BAL fluid were increased in group B and group D, which were significantly higher than that in group A ( q = 7.8, 9. 6, all P 〈 0. 05 ). Conclusion The results show that continuous allergen inhalation suppresses allergen-induced airway inflammation and produces immunotolerance, in which IL-10 may play an important role.
出处 《中华结核和呼吸杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2006年第11期735-739,共5页 Chinese Journal of Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases
关键词 哮喘 免疫耐受 白细胞介素10 炎症 Asthma Immune Tolerance Interleukin-lO Inflammation
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Walker C,Zuany-Amorim C.New trends in immunotherapy to prevent atopic diseases.Trends Pharmacol Sci,2001,22:84-90.
  • 2Riedl MA,Landaw EM,Saxon A,et al.Initial high-dose nasal allergen exposure prevents allergic sensitization to a neoantigen.J Immunol,2005,174:7440-7445.
  • 3Ling EM,Smith T,Nguyen XD,et al.Relation of CD+4 CD+25 regulatory T-cell suppression of allergen-driven T-cell activation to atopic status and expression of allergic disease.Lancet,2004,363:608-615.
  • 4Vissers JL,van Esch BC,Hofman GA,et al.Allergen immunotherapy induces a suppressive memory response mediated by IL-10 in a mouse asthma model.J Allergy Clin Immunol,2004,113:1204-1210.
  • 5Liu AH.Endtoxin exposure in allergy and asthma:reconciling a paradox.J Allergy Clin Immunol,2002,109:379-392.
  • 6Takabayashi K,Libet L,Chisholm D,et al.Intranasal immunotherapy is more effective than intradermal immunotherapy for the induction of airway allergen tolerance in Th2-sensitized mice.J Immunol,2003,170:898-905.
  • 7Epstein MM.Do mouse models of allergic asthma mimic clinical disease? Int Arch Allergy Immunol,2004,133:84-100.
  • 8尹佳,岳凤敏,王良录,何海娟,徐涛,张宏誉,李宏,文利平,孙劲旅,顾建青,韩少梅,叶世泰.夏秋季花粉症患者合并变应性鼻炎和变应性哮喘情况及其相互关系的研究[J].中华医学杂志,2005,85(24):1683-1687. 被引量:29

二级参考文献17

  • 1潘亚勤.蒿属花粉抗原的支气管激发试验与皮内试验、血清特异性IgE的关系[J].中华微生物学和免疫学杂志,1983,3(5):288-288.
  • 2Settipane RJ,Hagy GW,Settipane GA . Long-term risk factors for developing asthma and allergic rhimitis: a 23-year follow-up study of college students. Allergy Proe,1994, 15:5-21.
  • 3Rimpela AH , Savonius B, Rimpela MK, et al, Asthma and allergic rhinitis among Finnish adolescent in 1977-1991.Scand J Social Med,1995,23:5-60.
  • 4Simons FE. Allergic rhinobronchitis: the asthma-allergic rhinitis link. J Allergy Clin Immunol, 1999,104:534-540.
  • 5Grossman J. One airway, one disease.Chest,1997,111:11-16.
  • 6Bousque J,Cauwenberge PB, Khaltaev N, et al. Allergic rhinitis and its impact on asthma ARIA workshop report. J Allergy clin Immunol,2001,108 : S148-S217.
  • 7Asthma group of Chinese Society of Respiratory Diseases. The guideline of asthma treatment and prevention. Clin J Tuberc Respir Dis,1997,20:261-267.中华医学会呼吸病学会哮喘学组.支气管哮喘防治指南.中华结核和呼吸杂,1997,20:261-267.
  • 8Verdiani P, Di Carlo S, Baronti A. Different prevalence and degree of nonspecific bronchial hyperreactivity between seasonal and perennial rhinitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol, 1990, 86:86-582.
  • 9Prieto JL, Gutierrez V, Berto JM, et al. Sensitivity and maximal response to methacholine in perennial allergic rhinitis. Clin Exp Allergy ,1996,26: 61-7.
  • 10Linna O, Kokkonen J, Lukin M. A 10-year prognosis for childhood allergic rhinitis. Acta Paediatr,1992, 81:100-102.

共引文献28

同被引文献41

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部