摘要
目的研制钐(Sm)标记检测总前列腺特异性抗原(tPSA)及铕(Eu)标记检测游离前列腺特异性抗原(fPSA)的双标记时间分辨荧光免疫分析法(TRFIA)试剂盒。方法以抗PSA单克隆抗体101^#包被96孔微孔板,用Sm^3+标记抗tPSA单克隆抗体102^#、Eu^3+标记抗fPSA单克隆抗体201^#,采用双抗体夹心法建立t/fPSA双标记TRFIA。标准曲线由TRFIA检测仪自带的Log-Log_B函数处理。结果tPSA批内和批间变异系数(CV)分别为2.38%和3.91%,最低检测下限0.02μg/L,可测范围为0.02~250μg/L,回收率为101.3%;fPSA批内和批间CV分别为3.16%和3.34%,最低检测下限0.05μg/L,可测范围为0.05~250μg/L,回收率为103.2%。t/fPSA TRFIA试剂盒测定健康组、前列腺良性疾病组和前列腺癌组(Pca)的tPSA平均值为1.4μg/L、4.3μg/L、14.2μg/L,fPSA平均值为0.3μg/L、1.5μg/L、6.2μg/L。tPSA3.6μg/L、f/tPSA〈0.21为Pca与良性疾病的鉴别阈值。自制试剂盒与PE公司进口试剂盒同时测定血清样本,二者tPSA与fPSA的相关系数分别为0.99和Q97。结论自制t/fPSA TRFIA试剂盒的各项指标均达到临床检测要求,可替代国外同类产品。
Objective To establish the time-resolved fiuoroimmunoassay (TRFIA) of total prostate specific antigen (tPSA) labeled with Sm^3+ and free prostate specific antigen (fPSA) labeled with Eu^3+. Methods The monoclonal antibody (McAb) 101^# was coated on the 96 well plates, anti-tPSA McAb 102^# was labeled with Sm^3+ and anti-fleA McAb 201^# was labeled with Eu^3+. The standard curves were given out by Log-Log_B function of the DEFIA instrument. The levels of PSA in sera from patients or healthy volunteers were determined by t/fPSA TRFIA using the autoDELFIA1235 system. Results The measurement ranges of tPSA -TRFIA were 0. 02-250 μg/L and those of fPSA-TRFIA were 0.05-250 μg/L. The within-run and between-run CVs of the tPSA-TRFIA were 2. 38% and 3.91% , respectively, and those of fPSA-TRFIA were 3.16% and 3.34% , respectively. The recovery rates of tPSA-TRFIA and fPSA-TRFIA were 101.3% and 103.2%, respectively. The detection limitations of tPSA and fPSA were 0. 05 μg/L and 0. 02 μg/L, respectively. The average results of health group benign prostate disease patients, prostate cancer patients for tPSA were 1.4 μg/L,4. 3 μg/L, 14.2 μg/L, and those of fPSA were 0. 3 μg/L, 1.5 μg/L ,6. 2 μg/L. The cut-off point condition for benign prostate disease and malignant prostate cancer was tPSA 〈 3.6 μg/L, fleA/ tPSA 〈0. 21. The linear equation of tPSA and fPSA tested with PE and our kits were Y =0. 8641X -0. 0779, Y = 0. 9116X - 0. 0123, whose correlation ratio were 0.99 of tPSA and 0.97 of fPSA. Conclusions The availability of a highly sensitive, reliable, and convenient t/fPSA TRFIA method for quantifying PSA will allow investigations into the possible diagnostic value of analysis in various clinical condition and could be the substitute of import produts.
出处
《中华检验医学杂志》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2006年第11期1001-1004,共4页
Chinese Journal of Laboratory Medicine
基金
江苏省科学技术厅自然基金资助项目(BK2002133)