期刊文献+

当代“Science Studies”视阈下的客观性概念 被引量:4

Objectivity from Current "Science Studies" Perspective
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在当代“Science Studies”领域之内,存在着两个大的亚研究纲领,即SSK和后SSK。在SSK的思维框架之下,科学仍然是知识和表征,其客观性是由社会利益所决定的;而后SSK则将科学看作是一种动态的实践,其客观性在于实践过程中不以人的意志为转移的瞬时突现性。在本体论上,SSK仍然坚持康德式的自然与社会的二元论,而后SSK则打破了这种二分,认为自然与社会共同地建构了科学;在认识论上,SSK试图寻求现象背后的本质———社会利益,而后SSK则只关注科学实践中的各种可见的异质性要素的相互作用。 There are two sub-paradigms——SSK and Post-SSK——in the field of 'Science Studies'.SSK thinks of science as knowledge and static representations,which objectivity is determined by social interests;Post-SSK regards science as a dynamic practice,and defines its objectivity as the temporal emergence in the process of practice,which is beyond human's mind.From the ontology perspective,SSK claims the dualism between nature and society,however,Post-SSK break through this dualism and holds that both of nature and society construct science together;And from the epistemology perspective,SSK tries to discover the invisible essence behind the appearances of science——social interests,but Post-SSK only concentrates on the interaction of diverse visible heterogeneous factors in the scientific practice.
作者 蔡仲 刘鹏
出处 《科学技术与辩证法》 CSSCI 北大核心 2006年第6期41-44,共4页 Science Technology and Dialectics
基金 教育部2004年哲学社会科学重大课题攻关项目"当代科学哲学发展趋势研究"(04JZD0004)
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1大卫·布鲁尔.知识和社会意象[M].艾彦译.北京:东方出版社,2001.3-4,4,6,中文版作者前言,4.
  • 2H. M. Collins & Graham Cox. Recovering Relativity: Did Prophecy Fail? [J]. Social Studies of Science,Vol6,No3/4. 437.
  • 3巴里·巴恩斯,大卫·布鲁尔,约翰·亨利.科学知识:一种社会学的分析[M].邢冬梅,蔡仲译.南京:南京大学出版社,2004.67,132.
  • 4David Bloor. Left and Right Wittgensteinians, in Andrew Pickering(ed. ).Science as Practice and Culture[C]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992. 270.
  • 5安德鲁·皮克林.实践的冲撞—时间、力量与科学[M].邢冬梅译.南京:南京大学出版社,2004.5,19,20,228,228,84,229—231,223,中文版序言,243,3—4,214,217—219,222,中文版序言.
  • 6Michael Lynch. Extending Wittgenstein. The Pivotal Move from Epistemology to the Sociology of Science, in Andrew Pickering(eel. ) :Science as Practice and Culture[ C]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992. 229.
  • 7Ian Hacking. The self - vindication of the laboratory sciences, in Andrew Pickering ( ed. ) : Science as Practice and Culture[ C]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992. 30.
  • 8M. Callon & B. Latour. Don't Throw the Baby Out with the Bath School, in Andrew Picketing (ed.):Science as Practice and Culture [ C]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992. 347.
  • 9Andrew Picketing. Time and a Theory of the Visible [ J ]. Human Studies, 20. 326.
  • 10Andrew Picketing. From Science as Knowledge to Science as Practice, in Andrew Pickering( ed. ):Science as Practice and Culture [C]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press,1992.14

共引文献11

同被引文献54

引证文献4

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部