期刊文献+

接受性词汇量、产出性词汇量与词汇深度知识的发展路径及其相关性研究 被引量:71

Developments and relationships of receptive vocabulary size, productive vocabulary size and depth of vocabulary knowledge
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文旨在揭示接受性词汇量、产出性词汇量与词汇深度知识的发展路径及其相互关系。某大学英语专业一至四年级学生参加了本次调查。研究结果发现,从一年级到四年级学生的接受性词汇量呈线性发展趋势,而产出性词汇量发展则较为缓慢;词汇深度知识从一年级到四年级发展速度逐渐放慢,到四年级时基本停滞不前;接受性词汇量、产出性词汇量与词汇深度知识在四个学习阶段均有不同程度的显著相关。本文还探讨了这一研究对词汇教学的启示和意义。 This study aims to investigate the developments and relationships of receptive vocabulary size, productive vocabulary size and depth of vocabulary knowledge over three years of formal instruction. Four hundred and twelve English majors from 16 intact classes from Year one through Year four at a university in China participated in a cross-sectional study, and they were tested on the three aforementioned types of lexical knowledge. The results showed that receptive vocabulary size progressed in a linear pattern from Year one to Year four, and productive vocabulary size expanded at a much slower rate than the receptive vocabulary size. Depth of vocabulary knowledge improved from Year one to Year three, but the development stagnated as the subjects moved from Year three to Year four. Receptive vocabulary size, productive vocabulary size, and depth of vocabulary knowledge correlated with each other significantly at the four different learning stages. The results and pedagogical implications of the study were discussed from the perspective of the nature of vocabulary acquisition, the awareness of lexical competence and the English learning environments in China.
出处 《现代外语》 CSSCI 北大核心 2006年第4期392-400,共9页 Modern Foreign Languages
基金 山东省社科规划项目(项目批准号:05BYZ03)成果之一。
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

  • 1Aitchison, J. 1994. Words in the Mind: An Introduction to the Mental Lexicon (2^nd edition) [M]. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • 2Bauer, L. & I. S. P. Nation. 1993. Word families [J]. International Journal of Lexicography 6: 253-79.
  • 3Henriksen, B. 1999. Three dimensions of vocabulary development [J]. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 21: 303-17.
  • 4Krashen, S. 1989. We acquire vocabulary and spelling by reading:Addition evidence for the input hypothesis [J].Modern Language Journal 73: 440-64.
  • 5Laufer, B. 1994. The lexical profile of second language writing: Does it change over time? [J]. RELC Journal 25: 21-33.
  • 6Laufer, B. & I. S. P. Nation. 1995. Vocabulary size and use: Lexical richness in L2 written production [J]. Applied Linguistics 16: 307-22.
  • 7Laufer, B. 1998. The development of passive and active vocabulary in second language: Same or different? [J]. Applied Linguistics 19: 255-71.
  • 8Nation, I. S. P. 2001a. Using small corpora to investigate learner needs: Two vocabulary research tools [A]. In M. Ghadessy, A. Henry & R. L. Roseberry (eds.). Small Corpus Studies in ELT [C]. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 31-45.
  • 9Nation, I. S. P. 2001b. Learning Vocabulary in Another Language [M], Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • 10Qian, D. D. 2004. Evaluation of an in-depth vocabulary knowledge measure for assessing reading performance [J]. Language Testing 21: 28-52.

二级参考文献72

共引文献1613

同被引文献604

引证文献71

二级引证文献323

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部