摘要
结果加重犯在理论上的难题至今没有解决,废除死刑的国际大势向人们提出了从解释论上严格限制结果加重犯范围的现实要求。结果加重犯只能是基本犯的故意暴力行为过失导致了重伤或者死亡的犯罪。结果加重犯的未遂存在与否,基本上是一个立法论的问题。过失导致了加重结果的共犯,单独构成作为的结果加重犯,其他共犯构成的是不作为的结果加重犯,两者不构成加重结果部分的共犯。
The theoretical difficulties of aggregated consequential offense have not been resolved up to now. The national trend of the revocation of death penalty makes the realistic demand that we should strictl), restrict the range of aggregated consequential offense from the theory of interpretation. Aggregated consequential offense is only the crime that the malicious violence of the essential offense negligently leads to serious injury or death. Whether the attempted aggregated consequential offense exists or not is basically a problem of legislative theory. Negligence leading to the complicity of aggravated:consequence singly composes active aggregated consequential offense, and other complicities compose negative aggregated consequential offense, so the both dont compose the complicity in the past of aggravated Consequence.
出处
《辽宁警专学报》
2006年第6期17-19,共3页
Journal of Liaoning Police Academy
关键词
结果加重犯
限制
未遂
共犯
aggregated consequential offense
restriction
attempt
complicity