期刊文献+

经会阴引流在防治直肠癌Dixon术后吻合口瘘中的作用 被引量:5

The role of draining by perinaeum in prevention and treatment of anastomotic fistula after Dixon operation in rectel cancer patients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:评价经会阴骶前引流对防治直肠癌Dixon术后吻合口瘘的作用;方法:回顾分析我院1995年10月~2005年10月直肠癌前切除术351例,按术后经会阴骶前引流和经腹盆底引流分为两组,比较两组瘘的发生率,腹膜炎的发生率,瘘发生后的处理方式,平均愈合时间。结果:在经腹腔盆底引流组(A)和经会阴骶前引流组(B)中,吻合口瘘发生率分别为6.67%(10/150)和2.49%(5/201),具有统讣学意义(P〈0.05);腹膜炎A组6/10,B组0;瘘发生后A组7例行结肠外置术,B组5例均经冲洗引流而愈,未行二次手术;吻合口平均愈合时间:A组为28天;B组为12天。结论:经会阴骶前引流在防治直肠癌Dixon术后吻合口瘘中起着非常重要的作用。 Objective:To evaluate the role of different draining approaches in prevention and treatnent of anastomotic fistula after Dixon operation. Methods: Retrospective study was employed to analyze the experience of drainage after Dixon operation for 351 patients with rectal cancer from 1995 to 2005. Results: The incidence rates of anastomotic fistula by abdominal cavity drainage in the group(A) and by perineum drainage in the group(B) were 6.67% (10/150) and 2.49% (5/201) respectively (P 〈 0.05 ) ; Peritonitis in group A and B were 6/10 and 0, respectively,7 patients in group A received colostomy after fistula,5 patients in group B had been cured by washing the drainage tube. The average cure time of anastomotic fistula in group A was 28 days ,while that in group B was 12 days. Conclusion : The drainage of anterior sacral surface by perineum plays a very important role in prevention and treatment of anastomotic fistula after Dixon operation.
出处 《现代肿瘤医学》 CAS 2006年第12期1579-1580,共2页 Journal of Modern Oncology
关键词 直肠癌 吻合口瘘 引流 rectal cancer anastomotic fistula drainage
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献16

  • 1Heald RJ, Husband EM, RyaU RDH. The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery: the clue to pelvic recurreace? Br J Surg, 1982, 69(10): 613.
  • 2Heald RJ, Ryall RDH. Recurrence and survival after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Lancet, 1986,28(1): 1479.
  • 3Heald RJ, Chir M, Karanjia ND. Results of radical surgery for rectal cancer. World J Surg, 1992, 16(5): 848.
  • 4MacFarlane JK, Ryall RDH, Heald RJ. Mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. The Lancet, 1993,341(8843): 457.
  • 5Karanja ND, Corder AP, Bearn PO, et al. Leakage from stapled low anastomosis after total mesorectal excision for carcinoma of the rectum. Br J Surg, 1994,81(8):1224-1226
  • 6Graf W, Glimelius B, Bergstrom R, et al. Complications after double and single stapling in rectal surgery. Eur J Surg, 1991,157(9):543-547
  • 7Montemurro S, Caliandro C, Ruggeri E, et al. Endoluminal pressure: risk factor for anastomotic dehiscence in rectal carcinoma. Preliminary results. Chir Ital, 2001,53(4):529-536
  • 8Luchtefeld MA, Milsom JW, Senagore A, et al.Colorectal anastomotic stenosis. Results of a survey of the ASCRS membership. Dis Colon Rectum, 1989,32(9):733-736
  • 9Sadahiro S, Kameya T, Iwase H, et al. Which technique, circular stapled anastomosis or double stapling anastomosis, provides the optimal size and shape of rectal anastomotic opening? J Surg Res,1999,86(1):162-166
  • 10Liberman H, Thorson AG. How I do it.Anal stenosis. Am J Surg, 2000, 179(4):325-329

共引文献202

同被引文献45

引证文献5

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部