期刊文献+

论WTO国际责任的范围及其发展方向 被引量:6

下载PDF
导出
摘要 与一般国际法上的完全赔偿原则相比,其WTO国际责任的范围具有显著特点,即被诉方无须为其违法行为溯及既往地承担责任。原因在于,多边贸易规则直接和广泛地对各成员国内各种产业的发展同时从正面和负面产生着影响,而国际贸易活动的动态性和频繁性及影响贸易活动因素的复杂性,不时地会加剧出现某些严重不利情况的可能性。利益集团也常常会向政府施压谋求特殊保护。非溯及既往的责任/救济可使被诉成员在面临国内政治要求和履行国际义务的双重压力下,在政策的选择上能够有更多的灵活性。尽管已有学者和个别WTO成员提出在WTO体制中引入一般国际法中的完全赔偿原则,但迄今绝大多数成员尚未表现出这一意愿。因此,在可预见的将来,WTO国际责任范围上的非溯及既往原则将得以维持。
作者 张军旗
出处 《政治与法律》 CSSCI 北大核心 2006年第6期87-93,共7页 Political Science and Law
基金 国家社会科学基金青年项目"WTO体制中的国际法律责任制度研究"(项目批准号:05CFX033)成果之一。
  • 相关文献

参考文献32

  • 11929 PCJJ Series A,No.8,4,at 12,in Petros C.Mavroidis,Remedies in the WTO Legal System:Between a Rock and a Hard Place,European Journal of International Law,11(2000).
  • 2Petros C.Mavroidis,Remedies in the WTO Legal System:Between a Rock and a Hard Place,European Journal of International Law,11(2000).
  • 3Patricio Gran,Remedies Under WTO Law,Journal of International Economic Law,2001 4(755).
  • 4WTO Panel Report,US-Import Measures on certain Products from the EC,WT/DS165/R,circulated 17 July 2000.
  • 5WTO Panel Report,Guatemala-Anti-Dumping Investgation Regarding Portland Cement from Mexico,WT/DS60/R,19 June 1998,para.8.2.
  • 6WTO Article 21.5 Panel Report,EC-Regime for the Importation,Sale and Distribution of Bananas-Recourse by Ecuador,WT/DS27/RW/ECU,adopted 6 May 1999,para 6.105.
  • 7Article 21.5 Panel Report,Australia-Subsidies Provided to Producers and Exporters of Automotive Leather ("Automotive Leather"),WT/DS 126/RW,adopted 11 February 2000,para.6.27.
  • 8Article 16.1 of Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization:"Except as otherwise provided under this Agreement or the Multilateral Trade Agreements,the WTO shall be guided by the decisions,procedures and customary practices followed by the CONTRACTING PARTIES to GATT1947 and the bodies established in the framework of GATT1947."
  • 9Article 21.5 Panel Report,Automotive Leather,para.6.32.
  • 10Article 21.5 Panel Report,Automotive Leather,para.6.33-34.

共引文献1

同被引文献87

  • 1蒋新苗.DSU补偿措施的革新路径[J].中国法学,2004(4):168-178. 被引量:6
  • 2林颖毅.WTO《SCM协定》中特殊与差别待遇浅论[J].发展研究,2006,23(7):17-19. 被引量:1
  • 3Andereas F. Lowenfeld, International Economic Law, Oxford University Press,2002, p. 157.
  • 4TN/DS/W/29, TN/DS/W/51, TN/DS/W/51/Rev. 1, TN/DS/W/57.
  • 5John. H. Jackson, The WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding - Misunderstanding on the Nature of Legal Obligation, 91 American Journal of International Law, 1997, p. 61.
  • 6《谅解书》第26条.
  • 7Allan Rosas, Implementation and Enforcement of WTO Dispute Settlement Finding: An EU Perceptive, Journal of International Economic Law 4 ( 1 ) , 2001 ,p. 140.
  • 8Patricio Grane, Remedies under WTO Law, Journal of International Economic Law,2001, p. 762.
  • 9《谅解书》第21条第3款.
  • 10Arbitration Award, European Communities - Hormones, WT/DS26/15, WT/DS48/13, para. 26.

引证文献6

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部