期刊文献+

亲密关系的外显与内隐测量及其相互关系 被引量:25

Explicit and Implicit Measures of Intimate Relationships and Their Association
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了验证外显与内隐的差序格局,研究者考察了最亲密的家人、恋人以及最亲密的好朋友的外显和内隐亲密程度的差异与联系,以及性别对亲密关系的影响。结果表明,三个目标对象的外显亲密程度之间存在差异,但内隐亲密程度之间不存在差异;外显和内隐亲密程度之间相关不显著;外显测量结果没有显著的性别差异,但在内隐测量中,男性比女性对恋人感觉更为亲密。研究者针对这些结果分别进行了讨论。 The current study was designed to fill in this gap. In this study, the differences and associations between explicit and implicit closeness of the most intimate family member (blood relationship), lover (romantic relationship) and the most intimate friend (friendship) were investigated. Explicit closeness was measured by direct ordering and the Inclusion of Other in the Self (IOS) scale, while implicit closeness was measured by Implicit Association Test (IAT). It was within-subjects designed, with all the participants finishing the implicit and explicit measures of all three relationships. In addition to the two explicit measures, each participant also finished seven ures, the other three compared the three target figures to a er. IATs, three of which compared the self to the three target figgeneral other, and the last one compared self to a general other. The results indicated that a) There were significant differences between explicit closeness across the three targets. Specifically, family members were the closest, followed by romantic partner, and friend came the last. However, no differences existed in their implicit closeness; b) No significant correlation was found between explicit and implicit closeness; c) Gender differences were not significant in explicit measures. For implicit measures, males felt closer to lovers than females. A rough Differential Pattern can be drawn from this study. The differences found between implicit and explic;t measures might arise from the different nature of the cognitive underpinnings of the two types of closeness. These findings suggest potential usefulness of IAT as indirect measure of closeness. Future research should select more points from the continuum of closeness, such as general family member, classmates, and acquaintances in order to examine more thoroughly the Differential Pattern.
出处 《心理学报》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2006年第6期910-915,共6页 Acta Psychologica Sinica
基金 教育部重点研究基地2004年度重大研究项目(05JJDXLX004)
关键词 亲密关系 内隐测量 外显测量 close relationships, explicit measure, implicit measure.
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1杨国枢,林以正.家庭内外人己关系的心理差序格局:自我关涉性记忆效应的验证.华人本土心理学研究追求卓越计划九十一年度计划执行报告书.台北:国立台湾大学心理学系,华人本土心理学研究追求卓越计划办公室,2002
  • 2Uskul A K,Hynie M A,Lalonde R N.Interdependence as a mediator between culture and interpersonal closeness for Euro-Canadians and Turks.Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,2004,35(2):174~191
  • 3LI H Z.Culture,gender and self-close-other(s) connectedness in Canadian and Chinese samples.European Journal of Social Psychology,2002,32(1):93~104
  • 4Greenwald A G,McGhee D E,Schwartz J L K.Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition:The Implicit Association Test.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1998,74(6):1464~1480
  • 5Karpinski A.Measuring self-esteem using the Implicit Association Test:The role of the other.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,2004,30(1):22~34
  • 6朱滢,张力.自我记忆效应的实验研究[J].中国科学(C辑),2001,31(6):537-543. 被引量:95
  • 7杨红升,朱滢.自我与提取诱发遗忘现象[J].心理学报,2004,36(2):154-159. 被引量:36
  • 8Fazio R H,Olson M A.Implicit measures in social cognition research:their meaning and use.Annual Review of Psychology,2003,54:297~327
  • 9Kitayama S,Uchida Y.Explicit self-criticism and implicit self-regard:evaluating self and friend in two cultures.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,2003,39(5):476~482
  • 10Cross S E,Madson L.Models of the self:Self-construals and gender.Psychological Bulletin,1997,122(1):5~37

二级参考文献12

  • 1[1]Anderson M C, Bjork R A, Bjork E L. Remembering can cause forgetting: retrieval dynamics in long-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 1994, 20 (5): 1063 ~ 1087
  • 2[2]Smith R E, Hunt R R. The influence of distinctive processing on retrieval-induced forgetting. Memory & Cognition, 2000, 28 (4): 503 ~ 510
  • 3[3]Macrae C N, Roseveare T A. I was always on my mind: The self and temporary forgetting. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2002, 9 (3): 611 ~ 614
  • 4[4]Gazzaniga M S. Interview with Endel Tulving. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 1991, 3(1): 89 ~ 94
  • 5[5]Roediger H L. Why retrieval is the key process to understanding human memroy. In: E Tulving ed. Memory, Consciousness and the brain: The Tallinn Conference. Philadelphia: Psychology Press, 2000. 52 ~ 75
  • 6[6]Bjork R A. Retrieval inhibition as an adaptive mechanism in human memory. In: H L Roediger III, F I M Craik eds. Varieties of memory & consciousness. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1989. 309 ~ 330
  • 7[7]Markus H R, Kitayama S. Culture and self: implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 1991, 98 (2): 224 ~ 253
  • 8[9]Klein S B, Loftus L B, Burton H A. Two Self-Reference Effects: The Importance of Distinguishing Between Self-Descriptiveness Judgments and Autographical Retrieval in Self-Referent Encoding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1989, 56(6): 853 ~ 865
  • 9[10]Tulving E, Arbuckle T Y. Sources of intratrial interference in immediate recall of paired associates. Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior, 1963, 1: 321 ~ 334
  • 10[11]Symons C S, Johnson B T. The self-reference effect in memory: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 1997, 121(3): 371 ~ 394

共引文献117

同被引文献459

引证文献25

二级引证文献131

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部