期刊文献+

品牌延伸条件下的广告说服——双中介影响模型的拓展 被引量:12

Advertising Persuasion for Brand Extension: Revising the Dual Mediation Model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用实验调查和认知编码的方法,探讨消费者的广告前后品牌态度,品牌认知反应、广告认知反应、广告态度和购买意向之间的关系。结果表明:(1)广告前的品牌态度对广告认知反应、品牌认知反应和广告后的品牌态度有影响;(2)广告认知反应直接影响广告态度,但不直接影响品牌认知反应;(3)消费者的广告态度不但直接影响品牌认知反应和广告后的品牌态度,还直接影响购买意向。这说明在品牌延伸条件下,广告态度的双中介影响模型需要修正。 Most new products were introduced to the market by way of brand extension. It seems important for researchers and practitioners to understand how and why advertising for brand extension works. However, past advertising research mostly used fictitious brands as experimental materials. Because little attention had been given to advertising for brand extensions, the process by which advertising may impact attitude change of extended brands was largely ignored, and the influences of brand familiarity were seldom considered in the traditional persuasive hierarchy models. Furthermore, some research studies indicated that advertising for familiar brands may not work in the same way as advertising for unfamiliar brands, suggesting that research on familiar brands'advertising has significant theoretical and practical meaning. The purpose of the present study was to modify a dual mediation model (DMM) and to use the model to examine the effects of advertising for brand extensions. DMM, which derives from cognitive response theories, is a kind of persuasive hierarchy causal model. In the past 20 years, researchers using DMM have found the model to "best" fit the data in several experiments. However, most of these examinations used unfamiliar brands only. In the present study, we extended DMM into familiar brands and employed prior brand attitudes as exogenous variables. Five hundred sixty - four students at three Chinese universities participated in three studies. The experimental brand and advertising were selected according to whether or not brand extension was executed. In the main experiment, subjects were first asked to evaluate the experimental brand. Subjects were then exposed to the advertising stimuli and were finally asked to complete the following measures : attitudes toward advertising ( Aad), advertising cognitive responses ( Cad), brand cognitive responses (Cb), post -exposure brand attitudes (Ab) and purchase intention (Pi). In order to examine the internal validity of this pretest - posttest design, we conducted another no treatment pretest - posttest experiment. A replication study about another established brand was also carried out to examine the external validity of the results. This cross -validation procedures supported the conclusion that the extended model is invariant across different brands. The experiments yielded three sets of findings. First, prior brand attitudes ( PAb), which integrated the cumulated marketing efforts, had a significant impact on Cad, Cb and Ab. The implication is that, when researchers investigate the psychological constructs that occur as a result of familiar brands" advertising exposure, PAb should not be ignored for it contributes to the formation of Aad and Ab. The results also showed that the effectiveness of extended brands'advertising relied on whether or not consumers favored the brand. Second, the formation of Aad was a direct function of Cad and was an indirect function of PAb. This finding indicates that favorable prior attitude brings about strong attention to processes that help to form Aad and increases advertising effectiveness. Third, similar to DMM, Aad had a direct as well as an indirect effect on Ab through the mediating influence of Cb. Our findings were different from previous findings in that the direct effect of Aad on Ab was less than that yielded by unfamiliar brands. Our findings were also different from those of previous research in other ways that carry theoretical and practical implications. These findings are potentially relevant for brand managers and advertising managers who are concerned with the impact of advertising. The findings are also of particular interest to marketing researchers who study the psychological constructs of advertising as well as to those who wish to explore the marketing implications of brand extensions.
出处 《心理学报》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2006年第6期924-933,共10页 Acta Psychologica Sinica
关键词 广告前的品牌态度 双中介影响模型 品牌延伸 prior brand attitudes, dual mediation model, brand extension.
  • 相关文献

参考文献44

  • 1Smith R E.Integrating Information From Advertising and Trial:Process and Effects on Consumer Response to Product Information.Journal of Marketing Research,1993,18(May):204~219
  • 2Kent R J,Allen C T.Competitive Interference Effects in Consumer Memory for Advertising:The Role of Brand Familiarity.Journal of Marketing,1994,58(July):97~105
  • 3Campbell M C,Keller K L.Brand Familiarity and Advertising Repetition Effects.Journal of Consumer Research,2003,30(September):292~304
  • 4Machleit K A,Wilson R D.Emotional Toward the Advertisement:The Roles of Brand Familarity and Repetition.Journal of Advertising,1988,17(3):27~35
  • 5Machleit K A,Allen C T,Madden T J.The Mature Brand and Brand Interest:An Alternative Consequence of Ad-Evoked Affect.Journal of Marketing,1993,57(October):72~82
  • 6Tellis G J.Effective Advertising Understanding When,How and Why Advertising Works.Thousand Oaks:Sage Publications,2004
  • 7Gill J D,Grossbart S,Laczniak R N.Influence of Involvement,Commitment and Familiarity on Brand Beliefs and Attitudes of Viewers Exposed to Alternative Ad Claim Strategies.Journal of Advertising,1988,17(1):33~43
  • 8Cox D S,Cox A D.What Does Familiarity Breed? Complexity as a Moderator of Repetition Effects in Advertisement Evaluation.Journal of Consumer Research,1988,15(June):111~116
  • 9MacKenzie S B,Lutz R J,Belch G E.The Role of Attitude Toward the Ad as a Mediator of Advertising Effectiveness:A Test of Competing Explanations.Journal of Marketing Research,1986,19(May):130~143
  • 10MacKenzie S B,Lutz R J.An Empirical Examination of the Structural Antecedents of Attitude Toward the Ad in an Advertising Pretesting Context.Journal of Marketing,1989,53(April):48~65

二级参考文献11

  • 1陈宁.广告的加工时间和注意水平对消费者信息加工模式的影响[J].心理科学,2001,24(2):145-147. 被引量:16
  • 2Tellis G J. Effective Frequency: One exposure or three factors? Journal of Advertising Research, 1997, 14:75-79
  • 3Krutoman H E. Memory Without Recall, Exposure Without Perception. Journal of Advertising Research, 1977, 17 (August-September ): 7- 12
  • 4Kunst-Wilson W R, Zajonc R B. Affective discrimination of stimuli that cannot be recognized. Science, 1980, 207:557-558
  • 5Krishnan H S. Characteristics of memory associations: A consumer-based brand equity perspective. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 1996, 13:389-405
  • 6Ye G W, van Raaij W F. What inhibits the mere-exposure effect: Recollection of familiarity? Journal of Economic Research, 1997, 18: 629-648
  • 7Krishnan H S, Shapiro S. Comparing implicit and explicit memory for brand names from advertisements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 1996, 2:147-163
  • 8D'Souza G, Ram C R. Can Repeating an Advertisement More Frequently than the Competition Affect Brand Preference in a Mature Market. Journal of Marketing, 1995, 29(April) :25-49
  • 9Stapel J. Recall and recognition: A very close relationship. Journal of Advertising Research, 1998, 38:41-45
  • 10Forehand M R, Keller K L. Initial retrieval difficulty and subsequent recall in an advertising setting. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 1996, 5(4):299-323

共引文献31

同被引文献175

引证文献12

二级引证文献56

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部