期刊文献+

礼貌策略、人物塑造理论与戏剧文体学——综合性实例分析及模式修正 被引量:12

Politeness strategies,characterization theory,and drama stylistics:A synthetic case study with theoretical modifications
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文综合采用Brown和Levinson的礼貌模式(简称B-L模式)和Culpeper的人物塑造理论对Hampton的《慈善家》剧本第一幕进行文体分析,以展示在戏剧文体学中综合采用这两个模式的优越性。与仅仅采用B-L模式的Abdesslem对同一戏剧文本的分析相比,本文考虑了读者的认知机制,从整体上揭示了人物性格的塑造,并较好地阐释了戏剧冲突的发展过程。此外,本文在分析的基础上对两个理论模式提出了一些修正。 The study combines the B-L model and Culpeper's theory of characterization in the investigation of Hampton's The Philanthropist. It demonstrates the advantages of synthesizing the two theoretical models in the stylistic analysis of drama. Compared with Abdesslem's analysis of the same dramatic text based solely on the B-L model, the present study takes into account readers' cognitive processes and reveals the characterization in the dramatic conflict in a more systematic and integrated manner. Based on the analysis, the present study also makes some modifications to the theoretical models involved.
作者 高剑妩 申丹
出处 《外语教学与研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2006年第6期428-436,共9页 Foreign Language Teaching and Research
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Abdesslem, H. 2001. Politeness strategies in the discourse of drama. A case study [J]. Journal of Literary Semantics 30/2:111-138.
  • 2Baxter, L. A. 1984, An investigation of compliancegaining as politeness [J]. Human Communication Research 10/3:427-56.
  • 3Brown, P. & S. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Use [M]. Cambridge: CUP.
  • 4Culpeper, J. 2001. Language and Characterisation : People in Plays and Other Texts [ M ]. Harlow, England: Longman.
  • 5Fiske, S. T. & S. L. Neuberg. 1990. A continuum of impression formation, form category-based to individuating processes: Influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation [A]. In M. P. Zanna (ed.). Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. Vol. 23 [C]. New York: Academic Press.
  • 6Forster, E. M. [ 1927] 1987. Aspects of the Novel [ M]. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
  • 7Hampton, C. 1971. The Philanthropist. A Bourgeois Comedy. London: Faber & Faber.
  • 8Jones, E. E. 1990. Interpersonal Perception [M]. New York: Freeman.
  • 9Kelley, H. H. 1967. Attribution theory in social psychology [A]. In D. Levine (ed.). Nebraska Symposium on Motivation [C]. Loncoln, Nebraska, University of Nebraska Press.
  • 10Leech, G. N. 1983. Principles of Pragmatics [M]. London. Longman.

二级参考文献9

  • 1杨雪燕.话语分析与戏剧语言文体学[J].外语教学与研究,1991,23(2):17-22. 被引量:25
  • 2杨雪燕.试论戏剧在语言文体学中的地位[J].外国语,1989,12(1):69-72. 被引量:20
  • 3俞东明.戏剧文体与戏剧文体学[J].浙江大学学报(社会科学版),1996,26(1):100-103. 被引量:45
  • 4刘海平.英美戏剧[M].南京:南京大学出版社,1991.273-277.
  • 5俞东明.英语戏剧文体学的范围、性质与方法[A].王德春.英语百人百论[C].成都:四川科学技术出版社,1993.
  • 6Bennison, V.Discourse Analysis and the Dramatic Character [J].Journal of Language and Literature.2 (1993).
  • 7Sacks, H.Schegloff, A.& Jefferson, G.A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-taking for Conversation [J].Language.50 (1974).
  • 8Short, M.H.Discourse analysis and the analysis of drama [A].Carter, R.& Simpson, Language, Discourse and Literature [C].ed.P.London: Unwin Hyman, 1989.
  • 9Wessels C.Drama,1987.

共引文献339

同被引文献164

引证文献12

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部