监狱基层和机关警察焦虑状况的比较

Comparison of anxiety state between the first contact policemen and office policemen in prison

目的:了解监狱警察的心理状况,比较监狱基层警察和监狱机关警察焦虑程度,分析监狱警察焦虑产生的原因,提高监狱警察心理健康水平。方法:于2005-08从江苏省未成年犯管教所398名监狱警察中随机抽取130名作为调查对象。采用焦虑自评量表进行测评,该问卷共有20个问题,每个问题所得分累加即为总得分。分值越高,焦虑程度加重。结果:发放问卷130份,收回有效问卷119份,有效率为91.5%。男109名,女10名;年龄24～58岁,平均(32.1±6.69)岁。基层警察92名,男87名,女5名;平均年龄(31.51±5.89)岁;机关警察27名,男22名,女5名;平均年龄(36.93±7.65)岁。①监狱警察焦虑均分为38.53±8.21熏高于全国常模29.78±10.07,差异有显著性意义(t=11.62熏P<0.05)。其中焦虑得分高于正常上限46分的有21名,占17.5%。②监狱基层警察焦虑评分为39.41±8.54,监狱机关警察焦虑均分为35.69±6.30,两组比较差异有显著性穴t=2.06熏P<0.05雪。③监狱男性警察焦虑均分为39.11±8.41,监狱女性警察焦虑均分为37.25±5.44。两组比较差异无统计学意义穴t=0.61,P>0.05雪。监狱基层男性警察焦虑均分为40.04±8.45,监狱基层女性警察焦虑均分为38.84±5.47,两组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);监狱机关男性警察焦虑均分为36.20±8.76;监狱机关女性警察焦虑均分为35.19±5.51,两组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:监狱警察心理焦虑水平高于普通人群;监狱基层警察焦虑水平高于监狱机关警察。

AIM： To realize the psychological state of prison policemen, compare difference of anxious level between the first contact policemen and the department policemen, and analyze the reason resulting from anxiety of prison policemen in order to improve psychological health of prison policemen. METHODS： Totally 130 prison policemen from 398 in the nonage prison of Jiangsu province were randomly sampled in August 2005, and the self-rating anziety scale （SAS） was adopted in this investigation. There were twenty questions in the SAS test. The total score came from twenty questions. The higher the score of SAS test was, the more severe the level of anxiety was. RESULTS： Totally 130 questionnaires were sent out, and 119 questionnaires were retrieved with the effective rate of 91.5%. There were 109 males and 10 females, aged from 24-58 years with an average of （32.1±6.69） years. The 92 first contact policemen was composed of 87 males and 5 females with an average year of （31.51±5.89）; The 27 department policemen was composed of 22 males and 5 females with an average of （36.93±7.65）. ① The mean anxiety score of prison policemen was （38.53±8.21） that was higher than the normal value （29.78±10.07） in China. The difference was significant （t = 11.62, P 〈 0.05）. There were 21 policemen with over 46 points （upper normal limit）, and accounted for 17.5%. ② The mean anxiety score of prison policemen in first contact was （39.41±8.54）. The mean anxiety score of prison policemen in office was （35.69±6.30）. There were significant differences between two groups （t=2.06, P 〈 0.05）. ③ The mean anxiety score of male prison policemen was （39.11±8.41）, while the mean anxiety score of female prison policemen was （37.25±5.44）. There was no statistical difference between two groups （t=0.61, P 〉 0.05）. The mean anxiety score of male prison policemen in first contact was （40.04±8.45）, while the mean anxiety score of female prison policemen in first contact was （38.84±5.47）. There was statistical significance between the two groups （P 〉 0.05）. The mean anxiety score of male prison policemen in office was （36.20±8.76）, while the mean anxiety score of prison policemen in office was （35.19±5.51）. There was no statistical significance （P 〉 0.05）. CONCLUSION： The mean anxiety level of prison policemen is higher than that of normal people. The mean anxiety level of prison policemen in first contact is higher than that of prison policemen in office.