论民事诉讼普通程序向简易程序的转换

Discourse about Interchange of Common and Simplified Procedures in Civil Lawsuits

第一审民事诉讼案件适用普通程序或简易程序,一般依据原告起诉时的诉讼标的金额或价额,或依据民事案件的性质由法院裁量。为维护诉讼程序的安定性,经法院决定适用何种程序后,一般不允许任意转换程序。但诉讼程序是为诉讼案件服务的,诉讼程序的每一项形式规则,都应当与诉讼公正和诉讼效率这两大基本价值联系起来。当事人基于其程序主体地位,合意选择将民事案件由适用普通程序审理改为适用简易程序审理,人民法院在兼顾程序安定性等要求、在程序转换不致迟延诉讼的情况下,允许适用普通程序审理的民事案件转换为适用简易程序审理,符合民事诉讼的目的。

Courts have the mount of money and price appeal fight to choose common or simplified procedure according to the aed by the plaintiffs or the quality of the case in the first round of civil lawsuits. In order to safeguard the stability of procedures, it is not allowed to change procedures arbitrarily once having decided which procedure to be adapted. But contentious procedures serve for the case, any regulation of the contentious procedures should be considered by two basic views of value, that is, justice and efficiency. When litigants of both parts appeal to the court for changing common procedure into the simplified one, people＇s court, giving enough consideration to the stability of contentious procedures and the time guaranteed, can allow the civil case change from the common procedure to the simplified one.