期刊文献+

西酞普兰与丙咪嗪治疗抑郁症对照研究

A comparative study of citalopram and imipramine in the treatment of depressive disorders
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:比较西酞普兰与丙咪嗪治疗抑郁症的疗效及安全性。方法:将77例抑郁症患者随机分为两组,分别为西酞普兰组(41例)与丙咪嗪组(36例),疗程6周。用汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)及汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAMA)在治疗前及治疗后2、4、6周评定疗效;用副反应量表(TESS)评定不良反应。结果:西酞普兰组显效率70.73%、有效率85.36%,丙咪嗪组显效率75.0%、有效率86.11%,两组间差异无显著性(P>0.05);不良反应方面,西酞普兰出现不良反应18例,丙咪嗪出现25例,两组间差异有显著性(P<0.01)。结论:西酞普兰是治疗抑郁症较为安全有效的药物。 Objective:To compare the clinic effects and the safety of citalopram and imipramine in treatment of depression. Methods:Seventy seven patients with depressive disorder were randomly divided into citalopram treatment (41 patients)and imipramine treatment( 36 patients)for 6 weeks. The clinic effects and side effects were tested with HAMD, HAMA and TESS before treatment and 2, 4, 6 weeks after treatment respectively. Results: After 6 -week treatment, the significant improvement rate and response rate was 70.73% and 85.36% respectively in citalopram group, 75.0% and 86.11% respectively in imipramine group. There were no significant differences between two groups( P 〉 0.05 ). 18 patients had the side effects in citalopram group and 25 ones in imipramine group. There was statistically difference between two groups( P 〈 0.01 ). Conclusions: Citalopram has better efficacy and fewer side effects for depressive disorders.
出处 《中国民康医学》 2006年第23期1007-1007,1033,共2页 Medical Journal of Chinese People’s Health
关键词 西酞普兰 丙咪嗪 抑郁症 Citalopram Imipramine Somatoform disorders
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献4

  • 1Kyle CJ,Petersen HE,Overo KF.Comparison of the tolerability and efficacy of citalopram and amitriptyline in elderly depressed patients treated in general practice.Depress Anxiety,1998,8(1):147~153.
  • 2中华医学会精神科分会.中国精神障碍分类与诊断标准第三版(CCMD-3)[M].济南:山东科学技术出版社,2001.75-115.
  • 3姚贵忠,刘平,舒良,宣妙珍,王振怀.西酞普兰治疗抑郁症[J].中国心理卫生杂志,1999,13(3):162-164. 被引量:74
  • 4王祖新.另一SSRI西酞普兰[J].国外医学(精神病学分册),2003,30(2):75-77. 被引量:138

共引文献73

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部