期刊文献+

西酞普兰治疗大中学生抑郁症对照研究 被引量:1

Comparative study of citalopram and amitriptyline in the treatment of high school students and undergraduates' depression
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:比较西酞普兰与阿米替林治疗大中学生抑郁症的有效性及安全性。方法:收集在校大中学生抑郁症患者46例随机分为两组,分别给予西酞普兰与阿米替林治疗,疗程8周。用汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAML)在治疗前及治疗2、4、6、8周评定疗效,用副反应量表(TESS)评定不良反应。结果:两组总体疗效相当,治疗第2周时,西酞普兰组有效率较高,在第8周时两组疗效差异无显著性。结论:西酞普兰起效稍快,不良反应较轻,安全性好,更适合在校大中学生抑郁症患者。 Objective:To explore clinical efficacy and safely of citalopram and amitriptyline in the treatment of high school students and undergraduates'depression. Methods:46 patients of high school students and undergraduates with depression were treated randomly with citalopram or amitriptyline for eight weeks, and measured with Hamilton depressive scale ( HAMD), and treatment emergent symptom scale (TESS) before treatment and 2,4,6,8 weeks after treatment. Results: The both drugs were similar in efficacy, The side effects of eitalopram were less. Conclusions: Citalopram had faster on effect, also demonstrated a better tolerability in the treatment of high school students and undergraduates's depression.
出处 《中国民康医学》 2006年第23期1009-1010,共2页 Medical Journal of Chinese People’s Health
关键词 西酞普兰 阿米林替 大中学生 抑郁症 Citalopram Amitriptyline High school students and undergraduats Depression.
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献5

  • 1Bougerol T,Scotto JC,Patris M,et al.Citalopram and fluoxetine in major depression-comparison of two clinical trials in a psychiatrist setting and in general practice[J].Clin Drug Investigation,1997,14:77-89.
  • 2Stahl SM.Placebo-controlled comparison of the selective serotonin re-uptake in higitors citalopram and sertraline[J].Biol Psychiatry,2000,48:894-901.
  • 3Noble S,Benfield P.Citalopram:a review of its pharmacology,clinical efficacy and tolerability in the treatment of depression[J].CNS Drugs,1997,8:410-431.
  • 4陈彦方 顾牛范.新编临床精神药物手册[M].济南:山东科技出版社,1997..
  • 5王祖新.另一SSRI西酞普兰[J].国外医学(精神病学分册),2003,30(2):75-77. 被引量:138

共引文献148

同被引文献2

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部