期刊文献+

基于GSA的肘形判据用于电力系统不良数据辨识 被引量:26

Application of GSA-based Elbow Judgment on Bad-data Detection of Power System
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在分析GSA(gap statistic algorithm)数据挖掘技术应用于电力系统不良数据辨识的基础上,提出一种判断最佳聚类个数的肘形判据,该判据通过分析数据集的聚类离散度与聚类个数k的关系,按照各个k点的聚类离散度计算k处的肘形折角,并以最小肘形折角判断最佳聚类个数。将该判据与GSA相结合用于电力系统不良数据辨识。仿真结果表明:该方法不仅可以避免状态估计方法辨识的残差污染和残差淹没现象,而且可以克服单纯GSA辨识法在计算速度和辨识准确性方面的缺陷。对于大系统、数据量巨大的情况,该方法是一种快速高效的算法,具有很好的应用前景。 Based on bad data detection using GSA (Gap Statistic Algorithm) data mining method in power system, this paper propose the elbow criterion to estimate optimal clustering number. The criterion analyzes the relation between the degree of clustering dispersion and clustering number k of the data set firstly, then calculates the elbow angle at k and obtain the optimal clustering number based on the least elbow angle. Combined the criterion with GSA, bad data detection could be implemented efficiently, Computer results show that the integrated method not only can avoid residual pollution and residual submersion which would appear using traditional state estimate detection, but also is more accurate and rapid than GSA method. In the case of huge system and large amount of data, this method is a rapid and efficient algorithm, and has potential of good application.
出处 《中国电机工程学报》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2006年第22期23-28,共6页 Proceedings of the CSEE
关键词 电力系统 不良数据辨识 肘形判据 间隙统计算法 数据挖掘 聚类分析 power system identification of bad data elbow criterion gap statistic algorithm data mining cluster
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

二级参考文献41

  • 1[1]E.Handschin,F.C.Schweppe,J.Kohlas and A.Fiechter,Bad data analysis for power system state estimation. 1975,(2):329- 337
  • 2[2]L. Mili, Th. VanCutsem, M. Ribbens - Pavella, Hypothesis testing identification - a new msthod f~ bad data analysis in power system state estimation.1984, ( 11 ): 3239 - 3253
  • 3[3]Xiang Niande, Wang Shiying, Yu Erheng, A new approach for detection & identification of multiple bad data in power system state estimation. 1982,(2) :454 ~ 462
  • 4[4]F. Broussolle, State estimation in power sysytem:detecting bad data through the sparse inverse matrix method. 1980,678 ~ 682
  • 5[5]Ma Zhi - qiang, Bad data reestimation - identification using residual sensitirity matrix, 1981,7
  • 6Felix F Wu. Power system state estimation: a survey [J]. Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 1990,12(2): 80-87.
  • 7Holten L, Gjelsvik A, Aam S,et al.Comparison of different methods for state estimation [J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 1988,3(4): 1798-1806.
  • 8Monticelli A, Murari C A F, Wu F F. A hybrid state estimator: solving normal equations by orthogonal transformalions [J].IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, 1985, 104(12): 3460-3468.
  • 9Gjelsvik A, Aam S, Holten L. Hactel's augment malrix method - a rapid method improving numerical stability in power system static estimation [J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems,1985, 104(11): 2987-2994.
  • 10Pandian A, Parthasarathy K, Thukaram D, et al. A numerically stable decomposition based power system state estimation algorithm [J].Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 1998,20(1): 17-23.

共引文献123

同被引文献387

引证文献26

二级引证文献367

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部