4Harrison-Woolrych M,Ashton J,Coulter D.Insertion of the multiload Cu375 intrauterine device; experience in over 16000 new Zealand women.Contraception,2002,66:387-391.
5Harrison-Woolrych M,Ashton J,Coulter D.Uterine perforation on intrauterine device insertion:is the incidence higher than previously reported? Contraception,2003,67:53-56.
3Ohana E, Sheiner E, Leron E, et al. Appendix perforation by an intrauterine contraceptive device. European Journal of Obstetrics, gynecology, and Reproductive Biology,2000,11 (4) :219 - 222.
5Silva PD, Larson KM. Laparoscopic removal of a perforated intrauterine device from the perirectal fat. Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons / Society of Laparoendoseopic Surgeons, 2000,4 (2) :159 - 162.
6Eroglu K, Akkuzu G, Vural G, et al. Comparison of efficacy and complications of IUD insertion in immediate postplacental/early postpartum period with interval period : 1 year follow - up. Contraception,2006,74 (5) :376 -381.
7Markovitch O, Klein Z, Gidoni Y, et al. Extrauterine mislocated IUD : issurgical removal mandatory? Contraception, 2002,66 : 105 - 108.
8Grimaldi L, De Giorgio F, Andreotta P, et al. Medicolegal Aspects of an Unusual Uterine Perforation With Muhiload - Cu 375R. Am J Forensic Med Pathol,2005,26(4) :365 - 366.
9Eroglu K, Akkuzu G, Vural G,et al. Comparison of efficacy and complications of IUD insertion in imme- diate postplacental/early postpartumperiodwith in- terval period: 1 year follow-up [J]. Contraception, 2006,74(5) : 376-381.
10Ohana E,Sbeiner E, Leron E, et al. Appendix perfo- ration by an intrauterine contraceptive device[J]. Eu- ropean Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Repro- ductive Biology, 2000,11 (4) : 219-222.
