期刊文献+

释光断代的可靠性分析 被引量:1

The reliability analysis about luminescence dating method
下载PDF
导出
摘要 释光断代是一种测年方法,利用的主要是石英等矿物晶体对放射性辐射的次级响应规律。该方法不受其他因素干扰,断代时间基本涵盖第四纪范围,而且适用样品广泛,在细颗粒沉积物测年方面方法独特,在一定程度上弥补了测年工作中的某些空缺,受到第四纪、考古、地震、水文、环境演变等专业研究人员的重视。不过,其断代数据时有偏差,引起应用人员的困惑。本文试图对此进行一些分析和讨论。 The Luminescence Dating is a method that depends on the secondary respond rules of quartz and others mineral crystals with radiation. It is not be interfered by other factors. For instance, this interference could be from physical changes, chemical changes and others. The times of dating includes all the Quaternary Period. And a range of applicable samples are widely. Luminescence Dating is an especial method on the sediments dating of granule. For a certain extent this method makes up some defects of dating. At same time the Luminescence Dating is also regarded by some relevant professional research workers in the quaternary period, archaeology, seismology, hydrogeology and environment change. However dating data sometime deviate from the real age of sample, so it causes some confusion with people who want to apply these data. This paper would like to attempt analyzing and discussing some relevant problems about this dating method.
出处 《核电子学与探测技术》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2006年第6期713-716,共4页 Nuclear Electronics & Detection Technology
基金 国家自然科学基金(40472072)资助
关键词 热释光 光释光 辐射响应 断代 剂量 thermoluminescence optical luminescence radiation respond dating dose
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献1

  • 1Chen R,J Lumin,1991年,48/49卷,833页

同被引文献22

  • 1尹功明,林敏.沉积物电子自旋共振测年现状[J].核技术,2005,28(5):399-402. 被引量:17
  • 2李勇,周荣军,Densmore A L,Ellis M A,黎兵.青藏高原东缘龙门山晚新生代走滑挤压作用的沉积响应[J].沉积学报,2006,24(2):153-164. 被引量:65
  • 3姚海涛,赵志中,王书兵,乔彦松,李朝柱,傅建利,王燕,蒋复初.攀西地区晚新生代沉积研究回顾与问题讨论[J].地球科学进展,2007,22(5):504-514. 被引量:8
  • 4Dorale J A, Edwards E L, Alexander E C et al. Uranium-series dating of speleothems : Current techniques,limits & applications. In : Sasowsky I D, Mylroie J eds. Studies of Cave Sediments : Physics and Chemical Records of Paleoclimate. Kluwer Academic, New York Press,2004. 177 - 197.
  • 5Nishiizumi K, Lal D, Klein J et al. Production of Be and A1 by cosmic ray in terrestrial quartz in situ and implications for erosion rates. Nature, 319 : 134 - 135.
  • 6Lal D, Arnold J R. Tracing quartz through the environment. Journal of Earth System Science, 1985,94 ( 1 ) : 1 - 5.
  • 7Granger D E, Muzlkar P F. Dating sediment burial with in situ- produced cosmogenic nuclides: Theory, techniques and limitations. Earth and Planetary Science Letters,2001, 188 ( 1 - 2 ) : 269 - 281.
  • 8Granger I)E, Kirchner J W, Finkel R C et al. Quaternarydowneutting rate of the New River, Virginia, measured from different decay of cosmogenie 26A1 and --Be in cave-deposited alluvium. Geology,1997,25(2) :107 - 110.
  • 9Granger D E, Smith A L. Dating buried sediments using radioactive decay and muogenic production of 26A1 and --Be. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B ,2000,172 ( 1 - 4) :822 - 866.
  • 10Balco G, Shuster D L. 26A1- 1-Be - 21Ne burial dating. Earth and Planetary Science Letters ,2009,286 ( 3 - 4 ) :570 - 575.

引证文献1

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部