期刊文献+

不同原料制备生物柴油生命周期能耗和排放评价 被引量:79

Assessment of life cycle energy consumption and emissions for several kinds of feedstock based biodiesel
下载PDF
导出
摘要 建立了大豆、油菜籽、光皮树和麻疯树4种原料制生物柴油生命周期能源消耗和排放评价模型,并对其进行了生命周期能源消耗和排放评价。结果表明与石化柴油比较,大豆和油菜籽制生物柴油生命周期整体能源消耗与石化柴油基本相当;光皮树和麻疯树制生物柴油的生命周期整体能源消耗比石化柴油低约10%;所有原料制生物柴油生命周期化石能源消耗显著降低,生命周期HC、CO、PM10、SOx和CO2排放降低,NOx排放升高。 Life cycle energy consumption and emission assessment model for soybean, rapeseed, cornus wilsoniana wanaer (CWW), and jatropha curcaswas (JC) based biodiesel was established in this paper. And, life cycle energy consumption and emission assessment of soybean, rapeseed, CWW, and JC based biodiesel was conducted. Compared with conventional diesel, life cycle total energy consumption of soybean and rapeseed based biodiesel were basically equivalent to conventional diesel, life cycle total energy consumptions of CWW and JC were reduced by about 10%, and the life cycle fossil energy consumptions of all feedstock based biodiesel were remarkably reduced. Moreover, all of the life cycle HC, CO, PM10, sox, and C02 emissions except NOx of all feedstock based biodiesel were reduced.
出处 《农业工程学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2006年第11期141-146,共6页 Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering
基金 中国博士后科学基金资助项目(2004036348)
关键词 生物柴油 生命周期 能耗 排放 原料 biodiesel life cycle energy consumption emission feedstock
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Schumacher L G,Borgelt S C,Fosseen D,et al.Heavyduty engine exhaust emission tests using methyl ester soybean oil/diesel fuel blends[J].Bioresource Technology,1996,57(1):31-36.
  • 2Jurgen Bunger,Jurgen Krabl,Hans Ulrich Franke,et al.Mutagenic and catatonic effects of exhaust particulate matter of biodiesel compared to fossil diesel fuel[J].Mutation Research,1998,41 (1-2):13-23.
  • 3Charles L.Peterson,Todd Hustrulid.Carbon cycle for rapeseed oil biodiesel fuels[J].Biomass and Bioenergy,1998,14 (2):91-101.
  • 4John Sheehan,Vince Camobreco,James Duffield,et al.An overview of biodiesel and petroleum diesel life cycles[EB/OL].http://www.doe.gov/bridge.
  • 5孙平,江清阳,袁银南.生物柴油对能源和环境影响分析[J].农业工程学报,2003,19(1):187-191. 被引量:51
  • 6Consoli F,Allen D,Boustead I,et al.Guidelines for life-cycle assessment:a code of practice[M].Brussels:SETAC Europe,1993:18-67.
  • 7Walter M.Kreucher.Economic,environmental and energy life-cycle inventory of automotive fuels[A].SAE paper number 982218.
  • 8Hackney J,de Neufville R.Life cycle model of alternative fuel vehicles:emissions,energy,and cost trade-offs[J].Transportation Research Part A,2001,35A (3):243-266.
  • 9胡志远,戴杜,张成,浦耿强,王成焘.木薯乙醇—汽油混合燃料生命周期评价[J].内燃机学报,2003,21(5):341-345. 被引量:11
  • 10白添中,赵焰飞,郑笑彬,刘俊亮,潘华,张文效.山西介休利用焦炉气拟建6万t/a甲醇燃料工程生命周期评价[J].煤化工,1998(4):18-21. 被引量:3

二级参考文献14

  • 1许树宁,韦文科,梁朝旭,唐红琴.丰岭牌多元素复合肥肥效试验[J].广西蔗糖,1999(2):7-9. 被引量:7
  • 2中国电力年鉴编委会.中国电力年鉴[M].北京:中国电力出版社,2000.12-14.
  • 3Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC). Guidelines for Life-Cycle Assessment: a Code of Practice [M]. Brussels: SETAC Europe,1993. 127.
  • 4Wheals Alan E, Basso Luiz C. Fuel Ethanol after 25 Years[J]. Trends in Biotechnology, 1999, 17 (12) :482~487.
  • 5Rask Kevin N. Clean Air and Renewable Fuels: the Market for Fuel Ethanol in the US from 1984 to 1993[J]. Energy Economics, 1998, 20 (3): 325~345.
  • 6Fank Rosillo-Calle, Luis A B Cortez. Towards Proalcool Ⅱ—a Review of the Brazilian Bioethanol Programme[J]. Biomass and Bioenergy, 1998, 14 (2).115~124.
  • 7Wang M Q. GREET 1.5—Transportation Fuel-Cycle Model Volume 1:Methodology,Development,Use, and Results[R]. GREET 1. 5—Transportation Fuel-Cycle Model, ANL/ESD-39,Argonne, Argonne National Laboratory,1999. 34~44.
  • 8H.H.Grunardso.生产富一氧化碳合成气[J].制氢通讯,2001,(1).
  • 9常蓉,钱旭.我国汽车尾气污染及其控制[J].云南环境科学,1999,18(3):30-32. 被引量:6
  • 10贾飞.Shell煤气化净化工艺选择的探讨[J].大氮肥,2000,23(2):97-99. 被引量:5

共引文献76

同被引文献992

引证文献79

二级引证文献558

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部