期刊文献+

基于层次灰色模型的铁路技术创新绩效综合评价 被引量:8

Synthetic evaluation of technological innovation performance of railway on the basis of the Hierarchy Grey Model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 运用技术创新基本理论,结合铁路技术创新实际,从效益(经济、社会)增长、市场状态(市场份额、市场营销)改善和创新主体素质(技术装备水平、管理水平)提高3个方面建立了评价铁路技术创新绩效的多级指标体系。将层次分析法(AHP)和灰色系统理论结合起来建立了层次灰色评价模型(HGM),运用该模型对铁路技术创新绩效分别从整体和分项进行了综合评价,得出:铁路技术创新绩效绩优度为“一般”,其主要原因在于铁路运输市场状态改善中市场份额扩大程度较低。实证分析结果表明:改进层次灰色评价法(层次灰色评价模型)为一种评价铁路技术创新绩效的有效方法。 By applying the basic theories of technological innovation to the reality of the railway, the multistage index system of appraising technological innovation performance of the railway was set up from three respects: benefit (economy, society) increase, market state (market share, marketing) improvement and the subject quality (technical equipment , management level ) strengthening. Hierarchy Grey Model (HGM) was put forward through combining Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Grey Systematic Theory together, and the technological innovation performance of the railway was evaluated from the whole and parts by using the model. The following conclusion is gotten: The good performance degree of the railway technological innovation performance is " generally ", and the main reason is a lower degree of market share enlargement. The improved method of the HGM can be regarded as a kind of ideal appraisal method.
出处 《铁道科学与工程学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2006年第5期82-86,共5页 Journal of Railway Science and Engineering
基金 铁道部科技研究开发重点项目(2005F023)
关键词 铁路技术创新绩效 层次灰色模型 综合评价 灰色系统 层次分析法(AHP) technological innovation performance of the railway hierarchy grey model (HGM) synthetic evaluation grey system analytic hierarchy process (AHP)
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献25

  • 1朱孔来.评价指标的非线性无量纲模糊处理方法[J].统计与信息论坛,1997,12(3):11-15. 被引量:18
  • 2张文泉,张世英,江立勤.基于熵的决策评价模型及应用[J].系统工程学报,1995,10(3):69-74. 被引量:80
  • 3何璧.铁路改革模式选择[M].北京:中国铁道出版社,1998..
  • 4-.中国交通年鉴[M].北京:中国交通年鉴出版社,1999..
  • 5-.中国交通年鉴[M].北京:中国交通年鉴出版社,1989-1999..
  • 6Gautam Ahuja. Collaboration Networks, structural Holes,and Innovation: A Longitudinal study [J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, September, 2000,425 - 454.
  • 7Wilson, Daniell. Are We Running out of New ideas? A Look at Patents and R&D[J]. FRBSF Economic Letter,September 2003,1 - 3.
  • 8Torben Juul Andersen. Information Technology, Strategic Decision Making Approaches and Organizational Performance in Different Industrial Settings[J].Strategic Information Systems, February,2001,101 - 119.
  • 9王伍英.项目投资社会评价指南[M].北京:经济管理出版社,1997.165-170.
  • 10傅家骥.技术创新学[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2002.16-18.

共引文献73

同被引文献55

引证文献8

二级引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部