期刊文献+

放疗射野影像验证中CR不同摄影剂量对图像显示效果的影响(ROC曲线分析)

Effects of Different CR Exposure Dose on Image Quality in Radiotherapy Field Verification (ROC Curve Analysis)
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:评价CR不同摄影剂量在放疗射野影像验证中的图像显示效果。方法:将98颗直径为6mm的塑料小球作为信号源置于仿人体头颅模型上,以6MV的能量分别在1~8MU的剂量下由CR成像板获取信息并打印出照片,由3位放射学医师用5等级判别法各自独立阅片,用Rockit软件对观察结果进行ROC曲线分析。结果:1、2、3、4、5、6、7和8MU之Az值分别为0.7672、0.8253、0.8723、0.8832、0.8856、0.8604、0.8148和0.6869,以摄影剂量为5MU的Az值最高。将其与其它摄影剂量的Az值做两两比较t检验发现,与1MU和8MU比较,其P值分别为0.0013和0.0042,均小于0.01,说明差异有显著性意义;其与2、3、4、6和7MU比较,其P值分别为0.2537、0.3328、0.4536、0.3736、0.1894,均大于0.05,说明差异均无显著性意义。结论:CR用于放疗射野影像验证的摄影剂量为2~7MU较为适宜。 Objective: To evaluate the effect on images in field verification in radiotherapy with different exposure dose. Method:98 plastic balls (diameter=6mm) were placed on the human head skull model as signal resource,and signals were obtained from CR Imaging plate with 6MV X-ray and different close vary from I^8MU. Images were read by three radiologists respectively according to five-rank judgments method,the results were taken ROC analysis with Rockit software. Results:Respective Az value of 1MU,2MU,3MU…8MU was 0, 7672.0. 8253.0. 8723.0. 8832.0. 8856.0. 8604,0. 8148, 0. 6869,The Az value of the 5MU was the highest,t-test between 5MU and others showed:P value of the 5MLT and 1MU was 0. 0013〈0.01,P value of the 5MU and 8MU was 0. 0042〈0.01, there was significant difference; the other P value was 0. 2537 (2MU),0. 3328 (3MU),0. 4536 (4MU),0. 3736 (6MU),0. 1894 (7MU),all of P value〉0.05,there was no significant difference. Conclusion:2-7MU of CR exposure close in field verification in radiotherapy is suitable.
出处 《放射学实践》 2006年第12期1273-1275,共3页 Radiologic Practice
关键词 ROC曲线 对比研究 放射摄影术 ROC curve Comparative study Radiography
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献2

  • 1何华昌,中华放射学杂志,1982年,16卷,314页
  • 2Marsh DM,Malone JF.Methods and materials for the measurement of subjective and objective measurements of image quality .Radiat Prot Dosimetry,2001,94:37-42.

共引文献31

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部