期刊文献+

机器人腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术2年经验总结 被引量:3

Two-year experience with robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:评估机器人腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术(rLRP)的围手术期结果及开展该手术2年来的100例经验。方法:2003年1月-2005年5月对100例患者实施了达.芬奇机器人手术系统的rLRP。所有患者经前列腺穿刺活组织病理检查确诊为前列腺癌,骨扫描无转移灶。由专人负责收集术后早期及功能康复结果的资料。结果:患者平均年龄(63.5±5.4)岁,Gleason评分为6分,治疗前PSA为(9.4±6.9)μg/L。机器人准备时间和手术时间分别为(24±14)min和(182±52)min;平均失血量(272±240)ml,输血率7%。留置导尿时间(8.4±4.1)天,住院时间(2.9±1.5)天。无围手术期死亡和中转开放手术患者。严重并发症包括需要再手术的膀胱尿道吻合口漏、脑血管意外、暂时性输尿管梗阻。轻微并发症包括轻度漏尿、膀胱颈部狭窄、尿路感染。平均随访时间(6.6±5.0)个月。术后标本病理分期pT2为55%,pT3为45%。切缘阳性率为12.7%。结论:机器人腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术可以明显减少术中出血,降低输血率,缩短住院时间。机器人将复杂的盆腔腹腔镜手术变得简单易行,提高了手术的精细度和灵巧性。 Objective:To evaluate the initial 2-year experience with rLRP and reviewed the peri-operative outcome. Methods:One hundred patients underwent rLRP by a dedicated team using the da Vinci robotic surgical system from 1 February 2003 to 15 May 2005. All patients had histologically-confirmed adenocarcinoma on prostate biopsy and a negative bone scan. Peri-operative and early surgical outcome data were collected prospectively and functional recovery was assessed by an independent oncology nurse clinician. Results: The mean age at diagnosis was 63.5 ± 5.4 years. The median Gleason sum was 6 (range 4 to 9) and mean pretreatment PSA was 9.4 ±6.9 μg/L. The mean setup time and dissection time were 24 ± 14 minutes and 182 ± 52 minutes, respectively. The mean peri-operative blood loss was 272± 240 ml, and 7% of patients ( n = 7) required blood transfusion. The mean duration of bladder catheterization was 8.4±4.1 days, and mean hospital stay was 2.9± 1.5 days. There was rio peri-operative mortality or conversion to open radical prostatectomy. Major complications (4%) included urethrovesical leak requiring re-operation, post-operative cerebrovascular accident, and transient ureteric obstruction. Minor complications (7%) included minor urethrovesical leak, bladder neck stenosis, and urinary tract infection. Mean follow-up was 6.6±5.0 months. Pathological assessment showed pTz disease in 55% and pT3 in 45% of specimen. Margin positive rate was 12.7%. Conclusions:Robot-assisted LRP showed significantly low peri-operative blood loss, transfusion requirement and length of stay. The benefits of enhanced precision and dexterity for complex laparoscopic work in the pelvic cavity was apparent with the robot-assisted laparoscopic approach.
出处 《临床泌尿外科杂志》 2006年第12期886-888,共3页 Journal of Clinical Urology
关键词 前列腺癌 机器人手术 前列腺切除术 Prostatic carcinoma;Robot Prostatectomy
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Ahlering T E, Skarecky D, Lee D, et al. Successful transfer of open surgical skills to a laparoseopie environment using a robotic interface: initial experience with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy[J]. J Urol, 2003,170: 1738-1741.
  • 2Sim H G, Yip S K, Lau W K,et al. Early experience with robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy[J]. Asian J Surg, 2004, 27: 321-325.
  • 3Extermann M. Measuring comorbidity in older cancer patients[J]. Eur J Cancer, 2000, 36: 453-471.
  • 4Green F L, P. D, Fleming I D, Fritz A G, et al.AJCC Cancer Staging Handbook (6th ed.)[J]. New York: Springer, 2002.
  • 5Gleason D F, Mellinger G T. Prediction of prognosis for prostatic adenocarcinoma by combined histological grading and clinical staging[J]. J Urol, 1974, 111: 58-64.
  • 6Walsh P C, Marschke P, Ricker D, et al. Patient-reported urinary continence and sexual function after anatomic radical prostatectomy[J]. Urology, 2000, 55: 58-61.
  • 7Wei J T, Dunn R L, Marcovich R, et al. Prospective assessment of patient reported urinary continence after radical prostatectomy[J]. J Urol, 2000, 164: 744-748.
  • 8Fowler F J, Jr, Barry M J, Lu-Yao G, et al. Effect of radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer on patient quality of life: results from a Medicare survey[J]. Urology, 1995, 45: 1007-1013.
  • 9Rosen R C, Riley A, Wagner G, et al. The international index of erectile function (IIEF): a multidimensional scale for assessment of erectile dysfunction[J]. Urology, 1997, 49: 822-830.
  • 10Guillonneau B, Vallancien G. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the Montsouris technique[J]. J Urol, 2000,163: 1643-1649.

同被引文献82

  • 1方烈奎,杨江根.机器人辅助下的腹腔镜手术[J].广东医学,2005,26(1):8-9. 被引量:2
  • 2王德林,郑畏三,沈宏义,叶锦洪,刘鑫安,陈翘业.机器人经腹腔镜行前列腺根治性切除术60例的初步结果[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2005,26(5):298-301. 被引量:5
  • 3王德林,郑畏三.机器人经腹腔镜行前列腺根治性切除术:手术技术[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2005,26(5):358-360. 被引量:5
  • 4Schuessler W W, Schulam P G, Clayman R V, et al. Laparoscopic Radical Porstatectomy:Initial Short-term Expirence[J]. Urology, 1997,50(6) :854-857.
  • 5Guillonneau B, Vallancien G. Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: the Montsouris Technique[J]. J Urol, 2000,163 (6) : 1643- 1649.
  • 6Van Appledorn S,Bouchier-Hayes D,Agarwal D,et al. Robotic Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: Setup and Procedural Techniques after 150 Cases[J]. Urology,2006,67(2):364.
  • 7Chia K S, Seow A, Lee H P, et al. Cancer Incidence in Singapore 1993-1997 [R]. Singapore: Singapore Cancer Registry, 2000.
  • 8Rodriguez E Jr, Skarecky D W, Ahlering T E. Radical Robot Prostatectomy: Oncological Outcomes[J]. Arch Esp Urol, 2007, 60(4) :421-429.
  • 9Menon M, Tewari A, Peabody J. Vattikuti Institute Prostatectomy; Technique[J]. J Urol, 2003,169 : 2289-2292.
  • 10Ahlering T E, Skarecky D, Clayman R V. Successful Transfer of Open Surgical Skills to a Laparoscopic Environment Using a Robotic Interface: Initial Experience with Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy[J]. J Urol, 2003,170 : 1738-1741.

引证文献3

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部