期刊文献+

三峡库区小溪隧道口危岩稳定性评价与防治 被引量:1

STABILITY ANALYSIS AND TREATMENT METHOD FOR RILL TUNNEL PORTAL DANGEROUS CRAG IN THE THREE GORGES RESERVOIR REGION
下载PDF
导出
摘要 小溪隧道进口危岩位于重庆市涪陵区乌江西岸,岸坡陡峻。陡崖脚泥岩风化凹进形成崖腔,陡崖顶有阶梯状陡坎,在构造裂隙、软弱陡崖基座、卸荷裂隙带等因素的控制下,稳定性极差。作者采用地质分析和量化分析方法对危岩作了稳定性评价。危岩破坏形式有坠落、倾倒和滑塌3种。随着软弱基座差异性风化的进一步发展、崖腔进一步扩大、卸荷裂隙逐渐连续贯通,危岩体将失去稳定产生崩塌。采用支撑、锚固、拦石、排水、少量危石清除相结合的综合防治措施,是行之有效的。通过3个水文年的监测显示,本区工程在经历多个雨季后,每个监测点都是稳定的,危岩整治效果明显,防治措施起到了良好作用。 The rill tunnel portal dangerous crag is the west bank of Wu River in Fuling District, Chongqing. The bank slope is high and precipitous. There is the cliff cavity because of weathered mudstone at the steep mountain cliff foot. There are steep ridges as ladder on the top of the cliff. The cliff is no longer stable because of the factors such as structure crevasse, weak steep mountain cliff base, discharge crevasse belt. The author calculated the dangerous crag with two methods: geologic analysis and quantized assessment. There are three kinds of destruction forms, including crash, leaning over to and slippery collapsing. The further development, the cliff cavity makes decent which along with the weak base difference further expands, the discharge crevasse continuously links up gradually, the danger crag body will lose stable and lead to avalanche. The preventing and controlling countermeasure uses the strut, the anchor, blocking the stone, draining water, eliminating the few dangerous stone. This is effective. It is demonstrated through three hydrology years" monitoring, that each test point all is stable at the home court project after many rainy seasons. The effect of the danger crag renovated is obvious. The treatment method has played the good role.
作者 许家美
出处 《地质灾害与环境保护》 2006年第4期23-27,共5页 Journal of Geological Hazards and Environment Preservation
关键词 危岩 陡崖 稳定性评价 治理措施 dangerous crag steep mountain cliff stability analysis treatment method
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1319国道涪武路小溪隧道口危岩治理工程地质勘察报告[R].重庆:铁道第二勘察设计院,2002.
  • 2中华人民共和国国土资源部.崩滑地质灾害与防治[S].北京,2001.7.
  • 3建筑边坡支护技术规范(DB50/5018-2001)[S].重庆,2001.
  • 4重庆市三峡库区涪陵区319国道涪武段小溪隧道口危岩治理工程施工图设计[R].重庆:铁道第二勘察设计院,2002.
  • 5重庆市涪陵区小溪隧道口危岩治理工程监测报告[R].重庆:国家测绘局第五地形测量队,2005.

同被引文献25

  • 1吴树仁,张永双,韩金良,石菊松,何锋,谭成轩.三峡水库引水工程秦巴段工程地质条件研究[J].地球学报,2006,27(5):487-494. 被引量:22
  • 2陈龙,黄宏伟.岩石隧道工程风险浅析[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2005,24(1):110-115. 被引量:84
  • 3中华人民共和国行业标准编写组.铁路隧道超前地质预报技术指南[s].北京:中国铁道出版社,2008.
  • 4李术才,李树忱,张庆松,薛翊国,丁万涛,钟世航,何发亮,林玉山.岩溶裂隙水与不良地质情况超前预报研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2007,26(2):217-225. 被引量:304
  • 5杨天鸿,唐春安,谭志宏,朱万成,冯启言.岩体破坏突水模型研究现状及突水预测预报研究发展趋势[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2007,26(2):268-277. 被引量:180
  • 6SHI S S, LI S C, LI L P, et ah Multi-physical field information comprehensive analysis and application of tunnel water-bearing structure[J] International Journal of Environment and Pollution, 2013, 51 (3/4): 156- 165.
  • 7韩行瑞.三峡翻坝运输江南专用公路岩溶专题研究报告[R].桂林:中国地质科学院岩溶地质研究所,2007.
  • 8EINSTEIN H H. Risk and risk analysis in rock engineering[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 1996, 11(2) 141 - 155.
  • 9ESKESEN S D, TENGBORG P R, KAMPMANN J, et al. Guidelines for tunnelling risk management: International Tunnelling Association, Working Group No. 2[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2004, 19: 217-237.
  • 10铁道第四勘察设计院.宜万线深埋复杂岩溶隧道超前地质预报技术方法研究[R].武汉:铁道第四勘察设计院,2008.

引证文献1

二级引证文献56

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部