期刊文献+

跨物种感染是伦理上无关的吗?

Is Cross-Species Infection Morally Irrelevant in Xenotransplantation?
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目前没有确定的证据表明异种移植是安全的还是危险的。考察了关于跨物种感染的科学和哲学争论,总结出关于“跨物种感染是伦理上无关的”正反论证,提出自己的反论证。最后得出结论:跨物种感染不是伦理上无关的。并且,由于跨物种感染蕴藏的对公众的潜在的巨大风险,新的全球生命伦理学研究范式和涉及人体研究的新的伦理框架需要进一步研究。 There is no proof yet of safety or danger on cross- species infection in xenotransplantation till now. To examine the argument for the view that cross- species infection is irrelevant in xenotransplantation and against it respectively. Then to make a conclusion that cross- species isn't morally irrelevant in xenotransplantatlon. Furthermore, with the potential serious risk of crossspecies infection, a new global bioethical paradigm and a new ethical framework for clinical research on humans need to be proposed and developed.
作者 雷瑞鹏
出处 《医学与哲学(A)》 北大核心 2006年第12期51-52,68,共3页 Medicine & Philosophy:Humanistic & Social Medicine Edition
基金 国家教育部"985工程" 华中科技大学"科技进步与人文精神" 国家哲学社会科学创新基地和John Templeton FoundationGPSS Program"全球审视科学与精神研究项目"科学与人文精神"课题"
关键词 跨物种感染 异种移植 伦理论证 反论证 cross - species infection, xenotransplantation, ethical argument, counterargument
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1BUTLER D, et al. "The Trials of Xenotransplantation"? [J ]. Nature,2000, (406) : 661.
  • 2FANO, ALIX. "Xenotransplantation Debate"[J ]. The Lancet, 2000,(355):407-408.
  • 3FANO, ALIX. "Research in Xenotransplantation will Line Drug Industry's Pockets"[J]. BMJ, 2000, (320) : 869.
  • 4WEISSM, ROBIN A. "Transgenic Pigs and Virus Adaptation"? [J ]Nature, 1998, (391) : 327 - 328.
  • 5Welin, Stellan. "Starting Clinical Trials of Xenotransplantation - Reflections on the Ethics of the Early Phase? [J]. Journal of Medical Ethics, 2000, (26) :231 - 236.
  • 6BUTLER, DECLAN, et al. "Last Chance to Stop and Think on Risks of Xenotransplants" [J].Nature, 1998, (391 ) : 322.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部