期刊文献+

大鼠肝纤维化病理过程中Smads锚着蛋白表达变化 被引量:9

Dynamic characteristics of SARA during liver fibrogenesis in rats
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的观察肝纤维化病理过程中肝脏Smads锚着蛋白(SARA)的表达变化及其与肝纤维化的关系。方法大鼠每kg体重10μl二甲基亚硝胺腹腔注射,1次/d,每周连续3 d,共4周,复制大鼠肝纤维化模型。模型大鼠分别设首次造模后1、3 d、1,2、3、4周末,与造模停止后1、2、4周,共9个时间段为观察组。每组5~8只,另设正常大鼠10只为对照组。天狼猩红染色观察肝组织胶原沉积,盐酸水解法测定肝组织羟脯氨酸(HYP)含量,免疫组织化学染色观察肝组织SARA蛋白表达,Western blot法分析肝组织转化生长因子(TGF)β1、α-平滑肌肌动蛋白(α-SMA)和SARA蛋白的表达,并进行以上指标的相关性分析。结果随二甲基亚硝胺染毒持续,模型大鼠肝脏胶原增生(Hyp含量)与沉积增加,4周末时达到高峰,可见宽大纤维间隔与假小叶;而后随染毒停止,肝脏胶原沉积与纤维间隔有所减轻。模型组4、5、6、8周肝组织Hyp平均含量(μg/g)分别为193.0±39.2、188.5±39.9.174.4±21.2、163.6±31.5,对照组分别为125.6±19.5,t值在3.43~4.9,P值均<0.01。免疫组织化学染色发现,SARA主要表达于正常与纤维化肝脏的肝窦周围间质细胞,随肝纤维化发展SARA阳性染色细胞数量减少,随染毒停止与肝纤维化恢复,SARA渐恢复至正常组水平。Western blot发现,随肝纤维化形成,模型大鼠肝组织TGFβ1、α-SMA蛋白表达逐渐增加,而SARA蛋白表达逐渐减少;肝纤维化恢复过程中,SARA渐恢复接近正常水平,TGFβ1与α-SMA蛋白表达有所下降。在肝纤维化形成与恢复过程中,SARA蛋白与Hyp含量、TGFβ1与α-SMA表达均呈明显负相关。结论SARA蛋白主要表达于肝脏间质细胞;随大鼠肝纤维化发展,SARA表达减少,SARA蛋白与肝纤维化形成呈负相关关系。 Objective To investigate the dynamic characteristics of Smad anchor for receptor activation (SARA) expression during liver fibrogenesis in rats and the relationship between SARA and liver fibrosis. Methods Liver fibrosis was induced in 74 rats by intraperitoneal injection of dimethylnitrosamine (DMN) with a dosage of 10 μl/kg body weight, once a day, 3 days per week for 4 weeks. The model rats were randomly divided into 9 groups for studying the changes: 1 d, 3 ds, 1 week, 2 weeks, 3 weeks and 4 weeks after starting the ip injections (intoxicating phase), and 1 week, 2 weeks and 4 weeks after stopping the injections (5^th w, 7^th w and 8^th w, recovery phase). Each group included 5-8 rats. In addition, 10 non-treated rats served as normal controls. The rat liver tissues were examined. Collagen deposition was stained with Sirius red, and hydroxyproline (Hyp) was measured with Jamall's method. SARA spatial expression in the livers was detected by immunohistochemistry, and the expressions of TGF β1, α -SMA and SARA protein were detected by Western blot. The relationships of SARA with Hyp, TGF β1 and α-SMA were analyzed. Results During the intoxicating phase, the rat hepatic collagen production (Hyp content) and deposition increased as DMN intoxication continued, and there was marked fibrous septum and pseudo-lobule formation at the end of the 4^th w. During the recovery phase, the rat hepatic collagen deposition and fibrous septum formation were lessened, but the Hyp content in the livers of the model rats at the end of 4^th w, 5^th w, 6^th W and 8^th w was still higher than that of the controls (193.04± 39.15, 188.49 ±39.92, 174.39±21.22, 163.59± 31.47 vs 125.64± 19.51; t from 3.43 to 4.9, P 〈 0.01). SARA was mainly stained positively in interstitial cells surrounding the hepatic sinusoids in both normal and fibrotic livers, and the number of the positive stained cells decreased as liver fibrosis developed, and gradually returned to normal after stopping the intoxication. The expressions of TGF 151 and α-SMA were gradually increased, as shown with Western blot, but SARA decreased as liver fibrosis developed. The expressions of TGF 151 and α-SMA were slightly decreased, SARA expression recovered to the normal level after stopping the DMN intoxication. During liver fibrosis developing and recovery phases, SARA was significantly negatively correlated with TGF 151 and α-SMA expressions and Hyp contents. Conclusions SARA was mainly expressed in the liver interstitial cells, and it was negatively correlated with liver fibrosis formation.
出处 《中华肝脏病杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2006年第12期909-913,共5页 Chinese Journal of Hepatology
基金 国家自然科学基金(30472047) 教育部新世纪优秀人才资助计划(NCET-04-0437) 上海高校中医内科学E-研究院建设计划(E03008) 上海市重点学科项目(Y0302)部分资助
关键词 肝纤维化 转化生长因子Β Smads锚着蛋白 Liver fibrosis Transforming growth factor beta Smad anchor for receptor activation
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1刘成海,胡义杨,刘平,刘成.转化生长因子β_1与肝纤维化[J].中华肝脏病杂志,1996,4(1):53-56. 被引量:16
  • 2赵俊芳,刘成,刘成海.转化生长因子β胞内信号转导与Smads蛋白[J].中国病理生理杂志,2002,18(3):321-325. 被引量:37
  • 3Liu C,Gaca MD,Swenson ES,et al.Smads 2 and 3 are differentially activated by transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) in quiescent and activated hepatic stellate cells.Constitutive nuclear localization of Smads in activated cells is TGF-beta-independent.J Biol Chem,2003,278:11721-11728.
  • 4Friedman SL.Molecular regulation of hepatic fibrosis,an integrated cellular response to tissue injury.J Biol Chem,2000,275:2247-2250.
  • 5Bissell DM,Roulot D,George J.Transforming growth factor beta and the liver.Hepatology,2001,34:859-867.
  • 6Massague J.TGF-beta signal transduction.Annu Rev Biochem,1998,67:753-791.
  • 7Friedman SL,Bansal MB.Reversal or hepatic fibrosis-Fact or fantasy?Hepatology,2006,43(2 Suppl 1):S82-88.
  • 8Goto D,Nakajima H,Mori Y,et al.Interaction between Smad anchor for receptor activation and Smad3 is not essential for TGF-beta/Smad3-mediated signaling.Biochem Biophys Res Commun,2001,281:1100-1105.
  • 9Uemura M,Swenson ES,Gaca MD,et al.Smad2 and Smad3 play different roles in rat hepatic stellate cell function and alpha-smoooth muscle actin organization.Mol Biol Cell,2005,16:4214-4224.
  • 10Liu X,Wen FQ,Kobayashi T,et al.Smad3 mediates the TGF-beta-induced contraction of type Ⅰ collagen gels by mouse embryo fibroblasts.Cell Motil Cytoskeleton,2003,54:248-253.

二级参考文献12

  • 1Derynck R,Zhang Y,Feng XH.Smads:Transcriptional activators of TGF-β responses[J].Cell,1998,95(6):737-740.
  • 2Massague J.TGF-β signal transcription [J].Annu Rev Biochem,1998,67:753-791.
  • 3Feng XH,Derynck R.A kinase subdomain of transforming grow th factor -β(TGF-β)type l receptor determines the TGF-β intracellular signaling specifi city [J].EMBO J,1997,16(13):3912-3923.
  • 4Raftery LA,Twombly V,Wharton K,et al.Genetic screens to identify elements of the decap-entaplegic signaling pathway in Drosophila [J].Genetic s,1995,139(3):1347-1358.
  • 5Savage C,Das P,Finelli AL,et al.Caenorhabditis elegans gene s sma -2,sma-3,and sma-4 define a conserved family of transforming growth factorβ pat hway components[J].Proc Natl Acad Sci USA,1996,93(2):790-794.
  • 6Wu G,Chen YG,Ozdamar B,et al.Structure basis of smad2 r ecognition by the smad anchor for receptor activation[J].Science,2000,287(5 450): 9 2-97.
  • 7Tsukazaki T,Chiang TA,Davison AF.SARA,a FYVE domain protein th at recruits Smad2 to the receptor[J].Cell,1998,95(6): 779-791.
  • 8Xu L,Chen YG,Massageue J.The nuclear import function of Smad2 i s masked by SAR and unmasked by TGFβ-dependent phosphorylation[J].Nat Cell Biol,2000,2(8): 559-562.
  • 9Goto D,Nakajima H,Mori Y,et al.Interaction between Smad anchor for receptor activation and Smad3 is not essential for TGFβ/Smad3-mediated sig naling[J].Biochem Biophys Res Commun,2001,281(5): 1100-1105.
  • 10Kjellman C,Olofsson SP,Hansson O,et al.Expression of TG F-beta isoforms,TGF-beta receptors,and Smad molecules at different stages of human g lioma[J].Int J Cancer,2000,89(3): 251-258.

共引文献50

同被引文献75

引证文献9

二级引证文献87

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部