期刊文献+

利益分配的平等待人——关于公平原则的一个理论注解 被引量:7

Treating People Equally at Interest Distribution:——A Theoretical Note on the Principle of Fairness
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文的主要任务是对公平原则做出理论的诠释。研究表明:(1)公平其实就是利益分配上的平等待人;(2)一种利益分配是否平等待人,可以采用可逆性检验的方法来判别,即将利益冲突双方的角色进行调换,如果双方都认为分配方式是合理的,那么,利益分配就是公平的,反之则反是;(3)平等待人利益分配的实现需要满足个体的正义性及基本伦理规范的一致性两个条件;(4)由于合理分配的具体比例和方式是随时间和地点的变化而变化的,公平原则不可能用某一具体的规则或公式表示出来。 The main purpose of this article is to make a theoretical exposition on the principle of fairness. It shows: Firstly, fairness is treating people equally at the distribution of the social interests. Secondly, whether some method treats people equally at interest distribution or not, it can be justified by the reversible test. That is, if the reasonability of distribution is hold by both sides after the roles of both sides are exchanged, this method treats people equally at distribution and vice versa. Thirdly, individual justice and consistency of individual ethic normative are the sufficient and necessary condition for fair distribution. Finally, as for the variability of the specific reasonable distributional method, it is wrong to regard fairness as some distributional mode with invariable structure; that is to say, the criterion of fairness cannot be expressed by some mathematical formual.
作者 曾军平
出处 《上海财经大学学报》 CSSCI 2006年第6期56-62,共7页 Journal of Shanghai University of Finance and Economics
关键词 公平 平等待人 利益分配 可逆性检验 Fairness treating people equally rights distribution reversible test
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1[1]Buchanan J.M.Liberty,Market and State:Political Economy in the 1980s[M].Harvard University.1986.
  • 2[2]Nozick R.Anarchy,State and Utopia[M].New Yoke:Basic Books.1974.
  • 3[3]Samuelson P.The Foundations of Economic Analysis[M].Cambridge MA:Harvard University Press 1949.
  • 4[4]Stiglitz,J.H.Economics of the Public Sector[M].New York:Norton.1988.
  • 5李风圣.论公平[J].哲学研究,1995(11):41-46. 被引量:20
  • 6[14]罗尔斯.正义论[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2003.
  • 7[5]罗斯.社会控制[M].北京:华夏出版社,1989.
  • 8卢梭.社会契约论[M].北京:商务印书馆,2003,9..
  • 9苏晓离.略论经济分配中的某些价值观问题[J].哲学研究,1996(8):10-17. 被引量:7
  • 10王海明.试论公平五原则─—兼析罗尔斯正义论之误[J].北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版),1996,33(4):48-54. 被引量:11

二级参考文献7

  • 1[1]鲁宾斯坦.经济学与语言[M].上海:上海财经大学出版社,2004.
  • 2[3]宾默尔.博弈论与社会契约[M].上海:上海财经大学出版社,2003.
  • 3[4]休谟.人类理智研究[M].北京:商务印书馆,1975.
  • 4[5]D. Gauthier.Morals by Agreement[M].Clarendon Press,Oxford,1986.
  • 5[7]J.Harsanyi.Review of Gauthier's"Morals by Agreement"[J]. Economics and Philosophy,1987.
  • 6[9]J. Buchanan. A hobbsian Interpretation of the Rawlsian Difference Principle[J]. Kyklos, 1976.
  • 7冯友兰.中国哲学简史[M].北京:北京大学出版社,1984..

共引文献81

同被引文献14

引证文献7

二级引证文献50

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部