历史的意义——反思波谱尔的“历史有意义吗”

Significance of history——Rethinking of cal popper's "Is history significant?"

哲学在经历了理性时代的巅峰后,开始了更为深刻的对理性的反思。在存在与虚无之中、在解构之中,人的存在处于一个怎样的位置?相比较而言,我们传承而来的历史又怎样理解?尤其是上个世纪的两次世界大战,人们看到了理性旗帜下人性的灰暗。也正是在反思二战的过程中,波谱尔写作了他的《开放社会及其敌人》,并提出了历史没有意义,那么此种无意义是什么意义上来讲的?其内在又隐含着什么?文章旨在通过波谱尔的思路来寻找一个问题的出口。

Philosophy experienced the peak in the age of rea.,.on, we began a more profound, reflection to reason. In being, nothingness and deeonstrtuetion, what position people exist in？ Comparatively speaking, how can we understand the history that we fell heir to？ Especially in the two world wars last century, people have seen gloom of humanity uoder the banner of reason, in the process of reflecting on World War Ⅱ, Popper wrote his ＂The Open Society and Its Enemies＂ and proposed the history did not have significance. What is the point to the meaningless history？ Also what implicit in its internal？ In this article,Ⅰ want to find a problem exported from Popper.