2Steiner GG, Pearson JK, Ainamo J. Changes of the marginal periodontium as a result of labial tooth movement in monkeys. J Periodontol, 1981,52 (6) : 314-320.
3Thilander B, Nyman S, Karring T, et al. Bone regeneration in alveolar bone dehiscences related to orthodontic tooth movements. Eur J Orthod, 1983,5(2) :105-114.
4Damon DH. The Damon low-friction bracket: a biologically compatible straight-wire system. J Clin Orthod, 1998,32 ( 11 ) : 670-680.
5Pizzoni L, Ravnholt G, Melsen B. Frictional forces related to selfligating brackets. Eur J Orthod, 1998, 20(3) :283-291.
6Henao SP, Kusy RP. Evaluation of the frictional resistance of conventional and self-ligating bracket designs using standardized archwires and dental typodonts. Angle Orthod, 2004,74 ( 2 ) : 202 -211.
7Pandis N, Polychronopoulou A, Eliades T. Self-ligating vs conventional brackets in the treatment of mandibular crowding: a prospective clinical trial of treatment duration and dental effects. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2007,132 ( 2 ) : 208 -215.
8Menendez M, Alarcon JA, Travesi A, et al. Evaluation of dental arch width and form changes after orthodontic treatment with the Damon system. Proceedings of the International Orthodontic Conference ; 2005. Chicago : Quintessence ,2005:445.
9Weinberg M, Sadowsky C. Resolution of mandibular arch crowding in growing patients with Class I malocelusions treated nonextraction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1996, 110 ( 4 ) : 359-364.
10Germane N, Lindauer SJ, Rubenstein LK, et al. Increase in arch perimeter due to orthodontic expansion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1991,100(5) :421-427.
