期刊文献+

宫颈CIN2~3治疗后的随诊 被引量:4

Follow-up after treatment of CIN2~3
下载PDF
导出
摘要 宫颈CIN2~3的治疗方法包括宫颈病变表面破坏术、宫颈局部切除术以及必要时的全子宫切除术,宫颈局部切除术是宫颈CIN2~3的的标准术式。宫颈CIN2~3手术治疗后的复发率为0.7%~21%;影响宫颈CIN2~3术后复发的高危因素为切缘阳性、病变严重程度和年龄大于40岁;宫颈CIN2~3术后随诊的基本内容是细胞学、阴道镜及ECC,可采用HPV检测;宫颈CIN2~3术后随诊,细胞学出现两次低度病变或一次高度病变应行阴道镜和ECC检查.再次治疗的方式应临床个体化:CIN2~3的随诊和治疗具有同样的意义。 Treatment of CIN2 - 3 includes cervical ablation, cervical local excision and hysterectomy, while cervical local excision is the standard procedure for CIN2-3. The recurrence rate was 0. 7% ~ 21% after surgery treatment of CIN2-3 ;The high risk factors of recurring are positive margin, serious lesion and age over 40. The follow-up items for postoperation involve cytology, colposcopy, ECC and HPV testing; If there were 2 LSIL or 1 HSIL for cytology, the patients should be given colposcopy examination and ECC. Retreatment must be clinically individual one. It is the same significance for follow-up and treatment of CIN2-3.
出处 《基础医学与临床》 CSCD 北大核心 2006年第12期1308-1312,共5页 Basic and Clinical Medicine
关键词 CIN2-3 治疗 随诊 CIN2 - 3 treatment follow-up
  • 相关文献

参考文献26

  • 1Soutter WP, Barros Lopes A, Fletcher A. et al. Invasive cervical cancer after conservative therapy for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia [ J ].Lancet, 1997,349 (9057) :978 - 980.
  • 2Hoffman MS, Martina MA. 2001 consensus guidelines for the management of women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia[ J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol,2004,191 (3) : 1049.
  • 3Burke L, Covell L, Antonioli D. Carbon dioxide laser therapy of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia:factors determining success rate[J]. Lasers Surg Med,1980,1 (2) :113 - 122.
  • 4Favalli G,Lomini M, Schreiber C et al. The use of carbon-dioxide laser surgery in the treatment of intraepithelial neoplasia of the uterine cervix[J]. Przegl Lek,1999,56( 1 ) :58 -64.
  • 5Reich O,Pickel H,Lahousen M,et al. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia Ⅲ: long-term outcome after cold-knife conization with clear margins[J]. Obstet Gynecol,2001,97(3) :428 - 430.
  • 6Giacalone PL, I.affargue F, Aligier N, et al. Randomized study comparing two techniques of conizations: cold knife versus loop excision [J]. Gynecol Oneol, 1999,75 ( 3 ) : 356-360
  • 7Mathevet P,Chemali E, Roy M, et al. Long-term outcome of a randomized study comparing three techniques of conization: cold knife, laser, and LEEP[J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol,2003,106(2) :214 - 218.
  • 8Duggan BD, Felix JC, Muderspach LI, et al. Cold-knife conization versus conization by the loop electrosurgical excision procedure: a randomized, prospective study[ J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1999,180 (2 pt 1 ) : 276 - 282.
  • 9Ewies AA, Sant Cassia LJ. A review of the treatment failures following cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade Ⅲ treated by large loop excision of the transformation zone[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol,2000,20(4) :399 -402.
  • 10Carlo Prnna, Massimiliano Fambrini, Maria Grazia Fallani,et al. Laser CO2 conization in postmenopausal age: risk of cervical stenosis and unsatisfactory follow-up [J]. Gynecol Oncol,2005,96 ( 3 ) :771 - 775.

同被引文献26

引证文献4

二级引证文献30

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部