期刊文献+

GDX与OCT在测量RNFL厚度中的应用比较

The Comparison of Detecting RNFL using GDX and OCT
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨光学相干断层扫描仪(OCT)与激光偏振仪(GDx)测量视网膜神经纤维层厚度中的作用。方法采用配对对比法,选取42例80只眼,均予OCT、GDx测量视盘一周视网膜神经纤维层厚度,对结果进行对比。结果OCT与GDx测量视盘上方、下方和全周平均RNFL厚度值差异显著。对两者相应部位RNFL厚度进行相关分析发现两者呈高度正相关。结论在人眼视网膜神经纤维层厚度(RNFL)测量中OCT与GDx具有较好的敏感性与一致性,两者均可作为青光眼视网膜神经纤维层厚度(RNFL)病变的有效检测手段。 Objective To estimate the general power of OCT and GDX in the detection of glaucoma on the item of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness. Methods 42 patients (80eyes) underwent OCT and GDX. To compare the results. Results There was significant difference between the two methods, but they had significant plus correlation. Conclusions The sensitivity and agreement of GDX in the examination of RNFL is quite good compared with OCT for the detection of glaucoma.
出处 《医学研究杂志》 2006年第12期108-109,共2页 Journal of Medical Research
关键词 GDX OCT RNFL 青光眼 GDX OCT RNFL Glaucoma
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1Sanchez Galeam C ,et al. Using optical imaging summary data to detect glancoma. Ophthalmology ,2001,108 : 1812 - 1818.
  • 2Parisiv,M ,et al. Correlation between optical coherence tomography pattern electrorelinogram and visual evoked potentials in open - angle glancoma patients. Ophthalmology,2001,108:905 -912.
  • 3D. poinoosawmy,et al. The ability of the GDX Nerve Fibre Analyser neural network to diagnose glancoma. Graefes Arch clin Exp ophthaltool ,2001,239 : 122 - 127.
  • 4Robert N ,et al. Linda zangwill scanning Laser polarnetry to measure the nerve fiber layer of normal and glou comatous eyes. Am J Ophthalmol,1995,119:627 - 636.
  • 5曹群,王铮,崔宝华,卢颖毅,洪依舒.变化角膜补偿器偏振光激光扫描仪对青光眼的临床观察[J].中国实用眼科杂志,2004,22(6):425-427. 被引量:1
  • 6Schuman JS, et al. Quantification of nerve fiber thickness in normal and glaucomatons eyes using optical coherence tomography. Arch Ophthalmol,1995,113:586 -596.

二级参考文献13

  • 1Thomas P. Colen, Martha J H, Tojon- Fo-Sang, et al. Reproducibility of measurements with the nerve fiber analyzer (NFA]GDX). J Glaucoma 2000 ; 9:363-370.
  • 2Noriko yamada, Philip P Chen, Richard P Mills, et al. Glaucoma Screening using the Scaning Laser Polarimeter. J Glaucoma, 2000,9:254-261.
  • 3Neil T Choplin, Diane C Lundy, Andreas W Dreher. Differentiating patients with Glaucoma from Glaucoma suspects and normal subjects by nerve fiber layer assessment with Scanning Laser Polarimetry. Ophthalmology, 1998, 105: 2068-2076.
  • 4Robert N Weinreb, Sima Shakiba, Linda Zangwill. Scanning Laser Polarimetry to measure the nerve fiber layer of normal and Glaucomatous eyes. Am J Ophthalmol, 1995, 119:627-636.
  • 5Harmohina Bagga, David S Greenfield, William feuer, et al.Scanning Laser Polarimetry with variable corneal compensation and Optical Coherence Tomography in normal and Glaucomatous eyes.Am J Ophthalmol, 2003, 135: 521-529.
  • 6Robert N Weinreb, ChristopherBowd, Dvid S Greenfield, et al.Measurement of the magnitude and Axis of corneal polarization with Scanning Laser Polarimetry. Arch Opthalmol, 2002, 120:901-906.
  • 7Robert N Weinreb, Christopher Bowd, Linda M Zang Will.Glaucoma detection using Scanning Laser Polarimetry with Variable Corneal Polarization Compensation. Arch Ophthalmol, 2003, 121:218- 224.
  • 8David S Greenfield, Robert W Knighton, William J Feuer, et al.Correction for corneal PolarizatAon Axis improves the discrim Anating Power of Scanning Laser Polarimetry. Am J Ophthalmology, 2002,134:27-33.
  • 9Young H Kwon, Sungpyo Hong, Robert AH, et al. Correlation of Automated Visual Field Parameters and peripapillary nerve fiber layer thickness as measured by Scanning Laser Polarimetry. J Glaucoma,2000, 9:281-287.
  • 10Thomas P Colen, Hans G Lemij. Motion Artifacts in Scanning Laser Polarimetry. Ophthalmology, 2002, 109:1568-1572.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部