混沌世界的治理——罗西瑙混沌范式、全球治理研究被引量：7

Global Governance in a Chaotic World:Studies of Rosenau's Turbulence Paradigm and Global Governance

导出

摘要罗西瑙的混沌范式试图解释后冷战时代国际体系的变迁。它借鉴了复杂性科学中的混沌理论来理解国际体系,从国际体系的三个参量变化来解释国际体系形成两枝分形结构和呈现混沌状态的原因。混沌范式提供了一种全新的治理观,要依靠治理系统的自组织能力发挥治理的功效。这一理论范式结合了主流的现实主义和自由主义理论,不忽视建构主义理论的观念因素,具有其自身的特色。因而,这一理论对于理解后冷战时期的世界政治具有更大的优势,同时也存在一些不足之处。 James Rosenau's turbulence paradigm, which borrows chaos theory from the complex sciences, explains the changes in the international system in the post-cold war era. From three parameters of the international system, the turbulence paradigm illustrates that the world has changed into a bifurcated structure, thus displaying a chaotic state. In addition, the turbulence paradigm provides a new concept of global governance that relies on the self-organization of the international system. This paradigm, with its own characteristics, combines mainstream realism and liberalism theory, while not ignoring the ideational factor of constructivism. Thus, it has great explanatory power. However, at the same time it also has some problems.

作者林民旺

机构地区外交学院

出处《世界经济与政治》 CSSCI 北大核心 2006年第12期22-30,共9页 World Economics and Politics

基金 "自由主义国际关系理论研究"项目的一部分

关键词混沌理论混沌范式全球治理

分类号 D81 [政治法律—国际关系]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献19

1Jack Snyder and Robert Jervis, Coping with Complexity in the International System, Oxford: Westview Press, 1993, p. 1.
2James N. Rosenau and Mary Duffee, Thinking Theory Thoroughly:Coherent Approaches to an Incoherent World, Oxford: Westview Press, 1995,p. 1.
3James N. Rosenau, "Global Changes and Theoretical Changes: Toward a Postinternational Politics for the 1990s," in Ernst -Otto Czempiel and James N. Rosenau, cds. , Global Changes and Theoretical Changes, Lexington, Massachusetts/Toronto : Lexington Books, 1989, p. 5,p.11
4James N. Rosenau and Mary Durfee, Thinking Theory Thoroughly:Coherent Approaches to an Incoherent World, p. 34,pp. 37 -40,p. 34,pp. 40 - 42,pp.44 -56.
5James N. Rosenau, " Many Damn Things Simultaneously:Complexity Theory and World Affairs," in David S. Alberts and Thomas J. Czerwinki, eds. , Complexity Global Politic and National Security, Washington,D.C. : National Defense University, 1997, pp. 32-43.
6James N. Rosenau, Distant Proximities : Dynamics beyond Gtobalization, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 2003, pp. 205-222,pp.213 -214.
7James N. Rosenau, Turbulence in World Politics, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1990 p. 123,p. 88,p.25,p. 228,pp. 333 -387,pp. 124 - 136,p. 138,p. 183,p. 185,p. 186,pp. 315 -388.
8James N. Rosenau, Along the Domestic- Foreign Frontier, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997, pp. 137 -138,p.57，p. 145,p.147,脚注7,p. 151,p. 146,p.152.
9Yale H. Ferguson and Richard W. Mansbach, Remapping Global Politics, Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 2004, p. 29,p. 18,p.13
10Heidi H. Hobbs, ed. , Pondering Postinternationalism, New York :State University of New York Press, 2000, p. 45,p. 157,pp. 157 -159,p. 180,p. 159,pp. 169 -197,p.9.