“间接故意犯罪不存在未遂犯”通说之质疑

The Question to the General View of"No Attempt Crime in the Indirect Intentional Crime"

通说认为,未遂犯仅囿于直接故意犯罪之中,间接故意犯罪不存在未遂犯。然而客观言之,此通说之合理性是值得商榷的,间接故意犯罪并非完全不存在未遂犯。对此,可从心理学、法理学以及司法实践三个角度和层面提出支撑该观点的论据和基点,同时应注意以危害结果发生的确定与否、实施放任行为的过错大小、最终发生结果的严重程度等标准对间接故意犯罪中未遂犯的存在空间进行圈定和界分。

The general view of the academic circle thinks that the attempt crime exits in the direct intentional crimes, not in the indirect intentional crimes. Objectively speaking, however, the rationality of general view deserves to be discussed that there is also the attempt crimes in the indirect intentional crimes. For it, we bring forward three aspects and layers--the psychology, the jurisprudence, the jurisdiction practice as the reasons and bases of our view. Then we restrict and divide the existence of the attempt crimes in the indirect intentional crimes through the standards below--whether there is dangerous result, the mistake of intentional act, and the seriousness of the final result.