中文Frost多维度完美主义问卷的信效度检验

The Chinese Frost Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale:An Examination of Its Reliability and Validity

目的:检验中文Frost多维度完美主义问卷(FMPS)信效度。方法:共有1280名大学本科生作为被试填写了FMPS问卷,其1000名被试的数据用于探索性因素分析,另外280名被试的数据用于验证性因素分析。部分被试被要求填写测量焦虑、抑郁、强迫等心理困扰的问卷,作为效标效度检验。结果:中文版Frost多维度完美主义问卷由五个维度组成。各维度的项目载荷在0.45～0.78之间。五个因素(担心错误、条理性、父母期望、个人标准和行动的疑虑)可以解释总方差的53.7%。各维度的内部一致性系数为0.64～0.81,重测信度为0.63～0.82。中文FMPS与焦虑、抑郁、强迫等心理困扰也有显著的相关,其中“担心错误”和“行动的疑虑”与各种心理困扰的相关系数在0.30～0.70之间。结论:中文FMPS的维度结构与其英文原问卷相似,且具有令人满意的信效度,适合在中国文化环境下使用。

Objective： To evaluate the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Frost＇s Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale （FMPS）. Methods： One thousand two hundred and eighty Chinese undergraduate students participated in the study and responded to the FMPS and instruments measuring psychological distresses such as anxiety, depression, and obsession-compulsion. Both exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were used to examine the factor structure of the Chinese FMPS. The association between FMPS and psychological distresses was analyzed as an investigation for criterion validity. Results： Factor analyses extracted five of the original six factors of FMPS. PC did not emerge as a dimension. The five subseales were shown to have satisfactory internal consistencies with Cronbach＇s alpha between 0.64 and 0.81 and test-retest reliability 0.63-0.82. Chinese FMPS was associated with anxiety, depression, and obsession-compulsion. Particularly, CM and DA are correlated with these psychological distresses with coefficients between 0.30 and 0.70. Conclusion： Chinese FMPS is satisfactorily valid and reliable. It is suitable to use in Chinese college students.