期刊文献+

审计师变更与审计收费——两种理论的检验 被引量:12

Audit Change and Audit Fees: A Test of Two Theories
原文传递
导出
摘要 关于审计师变更是否会导致审计收费折扣存在交易成本和信息披露两种理论。通过收集中国自2001年年报公布审计收费数据以来的所有审计师变更数据,研究了审计师变更与审计收费的关系,以验证两种理论在中国的适用性。研究发现,审计师变更时存在明显的审计收费折扣现象,其折扣幅度为5.5%,进一步研究显示只有2001年的监管性变更存在显著的审计收费折扣现象,而自愿性变更不存在这一现象,上述结果更多地支持了信息披露理论,即审计收费信息公开披露后不存在明显的审计收费折扣现象,这说明在中国审计市场上并不存在明显的低价揽客行为。 Two completing theories of initial engagement audit pricing are examined empirically in China. They are theories of DeAngelo's "transaction costs" and Dye's "information disclosure". This paper collects all initial engagements from 2001 of audit fees' public disclosure, and finds that initial engagement exists in China, but only for supervisory changes in 2001. Therefore the findings support the Dye's "informational disclosure theory", that is when audit fees are publicly disclosed, there will no initial engagement discounting.
机构地区 南开大学商学院
出处 《管理科学》 CSSCI 2006年第6期89-96,共8页 Journal of Management Science
关键词 审计师变更 审计收费 交易成本 信息披露 auditor change audit fees transaction costs information disclosure
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Simon D,Francis J.The Effects of Auditor Change on Audit Fees:Tests of Price Cutting and Price Recovery[J].The Accounting Review,1988,63 (2):255-269.
  • 2Palmrose Z-V.Audit Fees and Auditor Size:Further Evidence[J].Journal of Accounting Research,1986,24(2):97-110.
  • 3Turpon R.Differential Pricing on Auditors' Initial Engagements:Further Evidence[J].Auditing:A Journal of Practice & Theory,1990,9 (2):60-76.
  • 4Ettredge M,Greenberg R.Determinants of Fee Cutting on Initial Audit Engagements[J].Journal of Accounting Research,1990,28 (1):198-210.
  • 5Baber W,Brooks E,Ricks W.An Empirical Investigation of the Market for Audit Services in the Public Sector[J].Journal of Accounting Research,1987,25 (2):293-306.
  • 6Deis D,Giroux G.The Effect of Auditor Changes and Audit Fees,Audit Hours,and Audit Quality[J].Journal of Accounting and Public Policy,1996,15 (1):55-76.
  • 7Pearson T,Trompeter G.Competition in the Market for Audit Services:The Effect of Supplier Contration on Audit Fees[J].Contemporary Accounting Research,1994,11(1):115 -135.
  • 8Dopuch N,King R.The Effect of Lowballing on Audit Quality:An Experimental Markets Study[J].Journal of Accounting Auditing & Finance,1996,14 (1):45 -68.
  • 9Schatzberg J.A Laboratory Market Investigation of Low Bailing in Audit Pricing[J].The Accounting Review,1990,65(2):337 -362.
  • 10Schatzberg J,Sevcik G.A Multiperiod Model and Experimental Evidence of Independence and "Lowballing"[J].Contemporary Accounting Research,1994,11(1):137 -174.

二级参考文献18

共引文献14

引证文献12

二级引证文献83

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部