期刊文献+

Long-term efficacy and safety of very-low-dose amiodarone treatment for the maintenance of sinus rhythm in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation after successful direct-current cardioversion 被引量:6

Long-term efficacy and safety of very-low-dose amiodarone treatment for the maintenance of sinus rhythm in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation after successful direct-current cardioversion
原文传递
导出
摘要 Background Long-term maintenance of sinus rhythm after successful conversion of chronic atrial fibrillation (CAF), often ameliorates patients' symptoms, reduces the risk of ischemic stroke and improves cardiovascular hemodynamics. This prospective study aims to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of very low-dose amiodarone (100 mg daily) for the maintenance of sinus rhythm after successful direct-current (DC) cardioversion in patients with CAF and rheumatic heart disease (RHD) post intervention. Methods This study was a randomized prospective trial. One day after successful DC cardioversion (remained normal sinus rhythm) in patients with CAF and RHD post intervention for more than six months and adequate anticoagulation, all were randomly administered either amiodarone 200 mg daily in group A or amiodarone 100 mg dally in group B. Results A total of 76 patients (40 men and 36 women) were examined from February 1998 to December 1999. The mean age of the patients was (664- 10) years, and the mean follow-up was (674-8) months (range 61 to 84 months). Actuarial rates of the maintenance of sinus rhythm were similar in the two groups after 5 years of follow-up. Four patients (11%) in group A but none in group B experienced significant adverse effects that necessitated withdrawal of amiodarone. No death occurred during the study period. Conclusion A very low dose of amiodarone results in adequate long-term efficacy and is safe for maintaining sinus rhythm in patients with CAF and RHD post intervention after successful DC cardioversion. Background Long-term maintenance of sinus rhythm after successful conversion of chronic atrial fibrillation (CAF), often ameliorates patients' symptoms, reduces the risk of ischemic stroke and improves cardiovascular hemodynamics. This prospective study aims to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of very low-dose amiodarone (100 mg daily) for the maintenance of sinus rhythm after successful direct-current (DC) cardioversion in patients with CAF and rheumatic heart disease (RHD) post intervention. Methods This study was a randomized prospective trial. One day after successful DC cardioversion (remained normal sinus rhythm) in patients with CAF and RHD post intervention for more than six months and adequate anticoagulation, all were randomly administered either amiodarone 200 mg daily in group A or amiodarone 100 mg dally in group B. Results A total of 76 patients (40 men and 36 women) were examined from February 1998 to December 1999. The mean age of the patients was (664- 10) years, and the mean follow-up was (674-8) months (range 61 to 84 months). Actuarial rates of the maintenance of sinus rhythm were similar in the two groups after 5 years of follow-up. Four patients (11%) in group A but none in group B experienced significant adverse effects that necessitated withdrawal of amiodarone. No death occurred during the study period. Conclusion A very low dose of amiodarone results in adequate long-term efficacy and is safe for maintaining sinus rhythm in patients with CAF and RHD post intervention after successful DC cardioversion.
出处 《Chinese Medical Journal》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2006年第24期2030-2035,共6页 中华医学杂志(英文版)
基金 This research was funded by internal funds at the Armed Forces Taichung General Hospital, Taiwan, China.
关键词 chronic atrial fibrillation rheumatic heart disease CARDIOVERSION very low-dose amiodarone chronic atrial fibrillation rheumatic heart disease cardioversion very low-dose amiodarone
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Herre JM,Sauve MJ,Malone P,Griffin JC,Helmy I,Langberg JJ,et al.Long-term results of amiodarone therapy in patients with recurrent sustained ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation[].Journal of the American College of Cardiology.1989
  • 2Chun SH,Sager PT,Stevenson WG,Nademanee K,Middlekauff HR,Singh BN,et al.Long-term efficacy of amiodarone for the maintenance of normal sinus rhythm in patients with refractory atrial fibrillation or flutter[].The American Journal of Cardiology.1995
  • 3Wolf PA,Abbott RD,Kannel WB.Atrial fibrillation as an independent risk factor for stroke? The Framingham study[].Stroke.1991
  • 4Van Gelder IC,Hagens VE,Bosker HA,Kingma JH,Kamp O,Kingma T,et al.A comparison of rate controland rhythm control in patients with recurrent persistent atrial fibrillation[].The New England Journal of Medicine.2002
  • 5Connolly SJ.Evidence-based analysis of amiodarone efficacy and safety[].Circulation.1999
  • 6Connally SJ.Evidence-based analysis of amiodarone efficacy and safety[].Circulation.1999
  • 7Mehmet K,Esin A,Ismail A,Fatih D,Filiz E.Clinical, echocardiographic,and hemodynamic characteristics of rheumatic mitral valve stenosis and atrial fibrillation[].Angiology.2005
  • 8Pritchett EL.Management of atial fibrillation[].The New England Journal of Medicine.1992
  • 9Kowey PR,Friehling TD,Marinchak RA,Sulpizi AM,Stohler JL.Safety and efficacy of amiodarone - the low-dose perspective[].Chest.1988
  • 10Pollak PT.Clinical organ toxicity of antiarrhythmic compounds: ocular and pulmonary manifestations[].The American Journal of Cardiology.1999

同被引文献31

引证文献6

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部