曹昭《格古要论》与王佐《新增格古要论》的比较

A Comparative Study of Cao Zhao's Gegu Yaolun and Wang Zuo's Xinzeng GeguYaolun

明初曹昭根据家藏和所见古物撰写《格古要论》,开创了古物赏鉴类著作的先河和体例。明代中期王佐对此书作了大量的增补,即《新增格古要论》,但因其杂抄而不受重视。本文从版本、作者、体例、内容几个方面对二书作了详细的比较,分析了其学术价值,并着重强调了王佐新增本的意义。

In the early-Ming Cao Zhao composed Gegu Yaolun on the basis of antiquities in the family collection and objects he had seen,thereby laying the foundation for the classification and appraisal of writings on antiquities.In the mid-Ming Wang Zuo substantially augmented this work and produced Xinzeng Gegu Yaolun,but because of the disorganised copying of this work,the latter collection was largely ignored by scholars.From the perspective of editions, authors,organisation and contents,the author provides a thorough comparison of the two works and an intellectual analysis of them,stressing the significance of the later work.