期刊文献+

不同碳水化合物食品血糖生成指数和胰岛素指数的评估 被引量:16

RESEARCH ON THE GLYCEMIC INDEX AND INSULIN INDEX OF DIFFERENT CARBOHYDRATE FOODS
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:测定不同来源碳水化合物食品GI值、II值。方法:10名空腹健康志愿者分别试食含碳水化合物50g的葡萄糖粉、富强粉馒头、燕麦纤维馒头和抗性淀粉馒头,测定餐后120min血浆中血糖和胰岛素水平。结果:以葡萄糖GI值、II值分别为100,三种馒头GI值分别为88.24±20.84、60.16±14.16、47.05±10.22;II值分别为83.06±10.81、68.32±17.08、60.26±30.1。食用抗性淀粉馒头后血糖峰值(45min)、胰岛素峰值(60min)及胰岛素与血糖应答曲线下面积比显著低于葡萄糖粉和富强粉馒头(P<0.05),与燕麦纤维馒头相比无统计学意义。燕麦纤维馒头血糖峰值(45min)低于葡萄糖粉(P<0.05)。结论:不同来源的碳水化合物食品有不同的血糖、胰岛素应答,抗性淀粉食品具有吸收缓慢而持久的特点,可维持餐后血糖稳态,降低餐后胰岛素分泌,提高机体对胰岛素的敏感性。 Objective: The glucemic index (GI) and insulin index (II) of wheat flour, oat fiber and resistant starch (RS) were studied. Method: Ten healthy subjects consumed 4 kinds of carbohydrate foods: glucose powder, wheat flour food, oat fiber food and RS food. Up to 120 rain after consumption of test materials, blood samples were taken for glucose and insulin analyses. Results: The GI value of wheat flour food, oat fiber food, RS food was 88.24±20.84, 60.16±14.16, 47.05±10.22 respectively, regarding glucose powder as 100. The II value of them was 83.06±10.68, 68.32±17.08, 60.26±30.1 respectively. The area and peak level under the glucose-response curve and insulin-response curve of RS food were significantly lower than those of glucose powder and wheat flour food (P〈0.05). Conclusion: RS food is potentially beneficial in sustaining blood glucose status and improving insulin sensitivity.
出处 《营养学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2006年第6期483-486,共4页 Acta Nutrimenta Sinica
基金 达能膳食营养研究与宣教基金(No.DIC2005-12)
关键词 碳水化合物 抗性淀粉 血糖生成指数 胰岛素指数 carbohydrate resistant starch glucemic index insulin index
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献17

  • 1杨月欣.血糖生成指数及其在预防慢性病中的意义[J].国外医学 卫生学分册,1998,11:149-149.
  • 2Botnry FRJ, Bizais Y, Varammes SBD, et al. α-amylase (EC. 3.2.1.1) susceptibility rather than viscosity of gastric emptying rate controls plasma response to starch in healthy humans [J]. Br J Nutr, 1990, 63:207-220.
  • 3Achour A, Flourie B, Franchisseur C, et al.Metabolic effects of digestible and partially indigestible starch: a study in the absorptive and postabsorptive methods in healthy humans [J]. Am J Clin Nutr, 1997,66:1151-1159.
  • 4Frost G, Leeds AA, Dore C J, et al. Glycemic index as a determinant of serum HDL-cholesterol concentration [J]. Lancet, 1999, 353(9158):1045-1048.
  • 5Truswell AS. Glycaemic index of foods [J]. Eur J Clin Nutr, 1992,46:S91-S101.
  • 6Jenkins DJA, Wolever TWS, Tayler RH, et al.Glycemic index of foods : a physical basis for carbohy-drate exchange [J]. Am J Clin Nutr, 1981, 34:362-366.
  • 7Champ MM, Molis C, Flourie B, et al. Small-intestinal digestion of partially resistant corn starch in healthy subjects [J]. Am J Clin ]Nutr, 1998, 68:705-710.
  • 8Jankins DJ, Vuksan V, Kendall CW, et al. Physiological effects of resistant starches on fecal bulk,short chain fatty acids, blood lipids and glycemic index [J]. Am J Coll Nutr, 1998, 17:609-616.
  • 9Raben A, Tagliabue A, Christensen N J, et al. Resistant starch: the effect on postprandial glycemia,hormonal response, and satiety [J]. Am J Clin Nutr, 1994, 60:544-551.
  • 10Pagliassotti MJ, Prach PA. Quantity of sucrose alters the tissue pattern and time course of insulin resistance in young rats [J]. Am J Physiol, 1995, 269(Regulatory Integrative Comp. Physiol. 38) :R641-R646.

共引文献118

同被引文献220

引证文献16

二级引证文献108

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部