期刊文献+

反倾销司法审查标准之比较研究 被引量:2

Comparative Study on Standards of Judicial Review of Anti-dumping Cases
下载PDF
导出
摘要 反倾销案件的司法审查标准,是指法院对被反倾销行政行为审查的范围和程度。审查标准是审理反倾销案件的核心问题,因为它直接关系到人民法院对反倾销行为的介入程度。由于反倾销案件的技术性和专业性较强,并且和国家的外贸政策有直接关系。因此,各国的反倾销司法审查的标准也不同。本文拟在对反倾销案件的司法审查标准进行比较研究的基础上,对完善我国的反倾销司法审查制度提出建议。 The standard of the judicial review of anti-dumping cases is linked with the court's review on the range and degree of the appealed anti-dumping administrative behaviors. The standard of review is the key problem of the anti-dumping cases, which is directly related to the degree and depth how the court intervenes in the anti-dumping behaviors. Due to the high technical and professional demand of anti-dumping cases and the direct relationship to the state's foreign trade policy, the review standards of different countries are very different. This paper tries to make a comparative study on the standards of the judicial review of anti-dumping cases of different countries and on this basis puts forward some points to improve our system of the judicial review of antidumping cases.
作者 张翠萍
出处 《北方工业大学学报》 2006年第4期44-48,共5页 Journal of North China University of Technology
关键词 反倾销 司法审查 标准 anti-dumping judicial review standard
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献41

  • 1王名扬.《美国行政法》[M].中国法制出版社,1998年版.第987-988页.
  • 2Pierre Didier: "WTO Trade Instruments in EU Law(Commercial Policy Instruments: Dumping Susidies Safeguards Public Procurement)", Cameron May, pp. 184.
  • 3Dyson Magnetics v. Commission, case T - 134/95, order of 14.3. 1996, ECR 1996 - 1/2/3, p. Ⅱ - 183.
  • 4Blackspur DIY and Others v. Council, case T - 168/94, judgement of 18 September 1995, ECR 1995 -9, p. Ⅱ -2627, confirmed on appeal(case C - 362/95 P, judgment of 16 September 1997, ECR 1997 - 8/9, p. Ⅰ - 4775, Srr also Detlef Nolle[ref. cit].
  • 5"DUMPING AND SUBSIDIES: The Law and Procedures Governing the Imposition of Anti - dumping and Countervailing Duties in the European Community" (third edition), by Clive Stanbrook, O. B. E.,Q. C. and Philip Bentley, Q. C., Kluwer Law International, p. 209.
  • 6John H. Jackson, Dumping in International Trade: Its Meaning and Context, in ANTIDUMPING LAW AND PRACTICE 2 - 3(John H. Jackson & Edwin A. Vermulst., 1989); Thomas v. Vakerics et al., antidumping, Countervailing Duty, and Other Trade Actions 23 - 193.
  • 7Case 191/82, FEDIOL v Commission, [1983] ECR 276.
  • 8Joined Case 239/82 and 275/82, Allied and others v Commission, [1984]ECR 1005.
  • 9Case 113/77, NTN Toyo Bearing Company Ltd. V Council, [1979] ECR 1185; Case C - 305/86, Neotype Techmashexort GabH v Commission and Council, [1990]ECR I - 2945.
  • 10Case 264/82, Timex v Council and Commission, [1985]ECR849; Case 53/83, Allied and others v Commission, [1985]ECR 1621.

共引文献13

同被引文献6

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部