摘要
文中分析了意向协议书的特征、功能和类型,认为由于当事人的主观意愿和意向书的客观内容不同,签订意向书可以产生预约、本约或不具有任何法律意义三种法律效果。提出意向书的合同效力须满足当事人意思表示一致、内容确定和愿意受协议约束三个条件。鉴于我国对意向协议书和预约合同未作出明文规定,文中建议我国最高法院出台相应的司法解释,并在未来民法典中确立预约制度。
This paper analyzes the characteristics, functions, and types of preliminary agreement. The subjective willingness of the related parties and the objective content of agreement are different. The preliminary agreement can produce such legal effects as pre-contract, contract or non-legal validity. And the preliminary agreement constitutes a contract under the condition of identical intent, definite content, and willingness of being restricted, Owing to no specific regulation on preliminary agreement and pre-contract in current civil law, relevant judicial explanation shall be formulated through the Supreme Court, and the pre-contract should be established in the future civil law.
出处
《当代经济管理》
2006年第6期119-122,共4页
Contemporary Economic Management
关键词
意向协议书
预约
效力
preliminary agreement
precontract
effect
