期刊文献+

消化道大出血金属钛夹治疗与外科手术治疗的效价比较 被引量:7

Comparative study of endoscopic hemoclip treatment and surgical treatment for severe gastrointestinal bleeding
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的通过观察金属钛夹及外科手术对消化道大出血的治疗效果及治疗费用,探讨内镜下金属钛夹治疗急性消化道大出血的临床应用价值及经济学价值。方法钛夹止血组(A组)采用经内镜对出血病灶放置金属钛夹止血;外科手术组(B组)采用“病灶切除术或胃大部切除术”。结果金属钛夹治疗组止血率100.0%,并发症发生率为0,平均住院时间17·82天,平均总住院费用5698.76元;外科手术治疗组止血率100.0%,术后并发症发生率42·86%,平均住院时间23.65天,平均总住院费用15831.56元。结论金属钛夹治疗消化道大出血具有止血效果确切、操作安全、简便、无并发症,费用低等优点,具有良好的效价比。 Objective To investigate the efficacy and hospitalization expense of endoscopic hemoclip treatment and surgical treatment in serve gastrointestinal bleeding, and to evaluate the clinical and economical value of endoscopic hemoclip treatment in serve gastrointestinal bleeding. Methods The patients of servere gastrointestinal bleeding were divided into two groups. Group A (8 patients) received endoscopic hemoclip treatment. Group B (include 7 patients) received surgical treatment. Results The rates of bleeding control were 100% in group A and B. The average number of days of hospitalization was 17.82 and 25.65 respectively in group A and group B. The average hospitalization expense in group A was much lower than that of group B,5698.76 yuan and 15831.56 yuan respectively. The rate of incidence of complication was zero in group A, while in group B was 42.86%. Conclusion The endoscopic hemoclip treatment for servere gastrointestinal bleeding is safe, effective and handy, can decrease the incidence of postoperative complication, and reduces the hospitalization expense and hospitalization time.
机构地区 解放军
出处 《胃肠病学和肝病学杂志》 CAS 2006年第6期619-620,共2页 Chinese Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
关键词 内镜钛夹治疗 手术治疗 消化道大出血 Endoscopic hemoclip treatment Surgical treatment Servere regastrointestinal bleeding
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献22

  • 1刘宾,王虹,张子其.胃镜下的缝合术──夹子结扎止血法[J].内镜,1995,12(3):186-187. 被引量:8
  • 2[1]Ohta S,et al.Hemostasis with endoscopic hemoclipping for severe gastrointestinal bleeding in critically ill patients.Am J Gastroternol,1996;91:701~704
  • 3[2]Hui WM,et al.A randomized comparative study of laser photocoagulation,heater probe,and bipolar electrocoaguation in the treatment of actively bleeding ulcers.Gastrointest Endosc,1991;37:229~304
  • 4[3]Lin HJ,et al.Heat probe thermocoagulation and pure alcohol injection in massive peptic ulcer hemorrhage:A prospective,randomized controlled trial.Gut,1990;31:753~757
  • 5[4]Waring JP,et al.A randomized comparison of multipolar electrocoagulation and injection sclerosis for the treatment of bleeding peptic ulcer.Gastrointest Endosc,1991;37:925~928
  • 6[5]Consensus Development panel.Consensus statement on thrapeutic endoscopy and bleeding ulcers.Gastrointest Endosc,1990;36:62~65
  • 7[6]Saeed ZA,et al.A scoring system to predict rebleedig after endoscpic therapy of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage' with a comparison of heat probe and ethanol injection.Am J Gastroenterol,1993;88:1842~1849
  • 8[7]Choudari CP,et al.Failure of endoscopic therapy for bleeding peptic ulcer:An analysis of risk factors.Am J Gastroenterol,1994;89:1968~1972
  • 9[8]Cook DJ,et al.Gastrointestinal bleeding in critically ill patients.N Engl Med,1994;330:337~381
  • 10[9]Muhldorfer SM,et al.Complication of therapeutic gastrointestinal endoscopy Endoscopy,1992;24:276~283

共引文献68

同被引文献44

引证文献7

二级引证文献68

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部