1Ham madeh ME,etal.Comparison between computerized slow-stage and static liquid nitrogen vapour freezing gmethods with respect to the deleterious effect on chromatin and morphology of spermatozoa from fertile and subfertilemen[J] Int J Androl,2001,24 (2):66 -72.
2Zilli L,et al.Evaluation of DNA damage in Dicentrarchus labrax sperm following cryopreservation[J].Cryobiology,2003,47:227-235.
4Mendoza C, Carreras A, Moos J, Tesaril J. Distinction between true acrosom e reaction anddegenerative acrosome loss by a one-step staining me thod using Pisum sativum agglutinin[J]. J Reprod Fert, 1992,95(7):755-763.
5Nagae T, Yanagimachi R, Srivastava PN, Yanagimachi H. Acrosome re action in human spermatozoa[J]. Fertil Steril,1986,45(5):701-707.
6Liu DY, baker HWG. Acrosome status and morphology of human spermatozoa b ound to the zona pellucida and oolemma determined using oocytes that failed to f ertilize in vitro[J]. Hum Reprod,1994,9(4):673-679.
7Talbot P, Chacon RS. A triple stain technique for evaluating normal acro some reactions of human sperm[J]. J Exp Zool,215(2):201-208.
8Mortimer D, Curtis EF, Camenzind. Combined use of fluorescent pernut agg lutinin lectin and Hoechst 33258 to monitor the acrosomal status and vitality of human spermatozoa[J]. Hum Reprod, 5(1):99-103.
9Mahadevan MM, Trounson AO. Relationship of fine structure of sperm head to fertility of frozen human sperm[J]. Fertil Steril, 41(2):287-293.
10Schill WB. The sperm acrosome functional and clinical aspects[J]. Hum R eprod,1988,3(2):193-197.
