试析不同主体情况下无单放货的法律性质

On Legal Nature of Delivery of Goods Without Presentation of the Original Bills of Lading From the Different Point of Subject

对于无单放货的法律属性,我国海商法理论和实务界一直众说纷纭,现有的研究成果多从承运人应承担何种责任的角度进行研究。事实上,承运人、代理人及其他相关人都可能实行无单放货行为,而不同主体情况下无单放货的法律性质和责任主体均不完全一致。承运人本人实行无单放货行为,有可能构成侵权,也可能构成违约,甚至要因欺诈而承担刑事责任;在代理人无单放货时,则要根据代理人是否获得授权而确定责任主体和性质,对无单放货的法律属性应根据主体的不同作出整体性的考虑。

With regard to legal nature of de.livery of goods without presentation of the original Bills of lading, researchers in Chinese Maritime law theory and practice have different opinions. The existing achievements has been studied mainly from the point which responsibility carriers should take. Based on his suggestion the legal nature of delivery of lading should be considered as a whole mainly from the point of subject of legal.