期刊文献+

客观证明责任存在基础:事实真伪不明分析

An Analysis of the Non Liquet of Elements of Law As the Foundation of Objective Burden of Proof
下载PDF
导出
摘要 作为客观证明责任基础的要件事实真伪不明,其存在是客观和不可避免的。重视其在纠纷审理和裁量中的存在,并以此为依据制定相关证明责任规则,将对我国长期以来持有的“发现绝对客观事实真相”的不正确观点是一种纠正和创新,更是避免了当事人的讼累和国家司法资源的过度浪费。 It is objective and inevasible that non liquet of the elements of law exists as the foundation of objective burden of proof. We should attach important to its existence in the disputes' hearing and judgment, and constitute the rule of burden of proof on the base of it. So, it would be the remedy and innovation to the former wrong view—discovering the utterly objective truth—which is held in a long time by our judges, and it would have further important meaning avoiding parties' damage and hurt, and the huge expense burden of judicial resources.
作者 刘洋
机构地区 河南大学法学院
出处 《柳州师专学报》 2006年第4期61-64,103,共5页 Journal of Liuzhou Teachers College
关键词 客观证明 责任 事实 真伪 objective evidence duty fact true or false
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1[德]汉斯·普维庭 吴越 译.现代证明责任问题[M].北京:法律出版社,2000..
  • 2[德]莱奥·罗森贝克 庄敬华 译.证明责任论[M].北京:中国法制出版社,2002..
  • 3[德]恩斯特·卡西尔.人论[M].甘阳译.上海:上海译文出版社,2002:31.
  • 4[美]伯尔曼 梁治平译.法律与宗教[M].中国政法大学出版社,2003..

共引文献88

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部