期刊文献+

未决羁押与人权保障若干问题研究

Research on Some Problems of Pretrial Custody and Guarantee of Human Rights
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文从分权制衡理论的角度提出控制未决羁押权滥用的若干思考:建立逮捕与羁押的司法审查机制,将逮捕与羁押决定权从承担追诉职能的警检机关转移给处于中立地位的法院;实行逮捕的令状主义规则,建立逮捕与羁押相分离的体制;重塑我国看守所管理体制,将未决羁押场所从公安机关分离出来,改由处于超然地位的司法行政机关管理;完善未决羁押阶段律师的辩护制度,真正实现控辩平衡、诉辩对等。 The essay researches on the pretrial custody system and its present operation in our country, introducing its successful practice from some western countries. To control the abuse of pretrial custody in our country, the essay,according to decentralization balance theory, puts forward the proposals as follows:to establish the judicial review mechanism for the arrest and detention, and endow the neutral law courts with the power to decide on detention; to practice the legal doctrine of arrest writs or warrants and build the mechanism of the separation of custody from arrestment; to reconstruct the administration system of loekups or houses of detention, separate them from the public-security departments and transfer them to be under the management of the detached administrative departments of justice; to improve the system of advocacy in the pretrial custody phases to make sure the balance of charge and defence.
作者 石允龙
出处 《皖西学院学报》 2006年第6期27-31,共5页 Journal of West Anhui University
关键词 未决羁押 司法审查 比例原则 pretrial custody a judicial review proportionate principles
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1张丽卿.刑事诉讼法理论与应用[M].台湾:三民书局,1977.
  • 2陈瑞华.未决羁押制度的理论反思[J].法学研究,2002,24(5):60-83. 被引量:168
  • 3李心鉴.刑事诉讼构造论[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2000.
  • 4陈瑞华.审前羁押的法律控制——比较法角度的分析[J].人大复印资料·诉讼法学、司法制度,2002,(3):77-77.
  • 5彭渤.日本刑事诉讼法通论[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2002.
  • 6马进保.律师在侦查阶段介入诉讼探析[A].陈光中,江伟.诉讼法论丛第2卷[C].法律出版社,1998,P124.
  • 7[美]E博登海默.法理学-法律哲学与法律诉论法[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,1999.
  • 8王宏璎.控、辩平衡对律师辩护制度的要求[J].兰州大学学报(社会科学版),2004,32(1):102-108. 被引量:2
  • 9中国政法大学研究中心.英国刑事诉讼制度的新发展[A].诉讼法论丛(第1卷)[C].北京:法律出版社,1998.

二级参考文献26

共引文献171

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部