1Adachi YU, Takamatsu I, Watanabe K, et al. Evaluation of the cardiovascular responses to fiberoptic orotracheal intubation with television monitoring: comparison with conventional direct laryngoscopy.J Clin Anesth,2000,12:503-508.
2Barak M, Ziser A, Greenberg A, et al. Hemodynamic and catecholamine responses to tracheal intubation: direct laryngoscopy compared with fiberoptic intubation. J Clin Anesth,2003,15:132-136.
3Shribman AJ,Smith G,Achola KJ. Cardiovascular and catecholamine responses to laryngoscopy with and without tracheal intubarion. Br J Anaesth, 1987,59:295-299.
4Hirabayashi Y, Hiruta M, Kawakami T, et al. Effects of lightwand ( Tracllight) compared with direct laryngoscopy on circulatory responses to tracheal intubation. Br J Anaesth, 1998,81:253-255.
5Hawkyard SJ, Morrison A, Doyle LA, et al. Attenuating the hypertensive response to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation using awake fiberoptic intubation. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 1992,36:1-4.
6Latorre F, Hofmann M, Kleemann PP, et al. Stress response to nasotracheal intubation. A comparative evaluation of fiberendoscopic vs laryngoscopic intubation with and without topical anaesthesia of the larynx. Anesthesist, 1993,42:423-436.
7Adachi YU, Satamoto M, Higuchi H, et al. Fentanyl attenuates the hemodynamic response to endotracheal intubation more than the response to laryngoscopy. Anesth Analg, 2002,95: 233-237.
