两层分级多学科设计框架在AUV的总体设计中的应用(英文) 被引量：3

Application of Hierarchical Bilevel Framework of MDO Methodology to AUV Design Optimization

下载PDF

导出

摘要将多学科优化方法作为一种新的设计方法应用于AUV的总体性能优化设计中。文中构建顶层控制系统层和并行独立子系统底层的两层分级的多学科优化设计框架,来实现AUV总体设计的有效载荷部分长度和推进力最大化和总重量最小化等的多个设计目标。使用的设计工具为商业软件iSIGHT和Fortran。 Muhidisciplinary optimization design （MDO） is presented for an autonomous underwater vehicle （AUV） design as a new approach of general performance optimization. The framework of MDO introduced in this paper is bilevel and hierarchical, which is the high controlling system level and low level of parallel individual subsystems. The methodology is suitable to maximize the payload length and thrust force of AUV and minimize its gross weight.The tools of commercial software iSIGHT and Fortran are used to realize MDO design of AUV.

作者刘蔚苟鹏操安喜崔维成

机构地区上海交通大学船舶海洋与建筑工程学院中国船舶科学研究中心

出处《船舶力学》 EI 北大核心 2006年第6期122-130,共9页 Journal of Ship Mechanics

关键词多学科优化两层分级多学科优化框架 AUV 总体性能优化设计 MDO hierarchical bilevel framework minimization weight optimizing aims AUV

分类号 U662.2 [交通运输工程—船舶及航道工程]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献2

1刘蔚,崔维成.多学科设计优化:载人潜水器设计的一种新工具(英文)[J].船舶力学,2004,8(6):95-112. 被引量：22
2刘涛,徐芑南,王惠铮,吴幼华,刘正元.“CR -02”6000m无人自治水下机器人载体系统(英文)[J].船舶力学,2002,6(6):114-119. 被引量：8

二级参考文献43

1[4]Kodiyalam S. Evaluation of methods for multidisciplinary design optimization, Phase I [R]. NASA/CR-1998-208716,1998.
2[5]Alexandrov N M, Lewis R M. Analytical and computational aspects of collaborative optimization for multidisciplinary design[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 1999, 36(1):301-309.
3[6]Hassan R A, Crossley W A. Multi-objective optimization of communication satellites with two-branch tournament genetic algorithm[J]. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 2003,40(2):266-272.
4[7]Lin C Y, Hajela P. Genetic search strategies in large scale optimization]A]. Proceedings of the AIAA/ASME/ASCE/ASC 34th Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Material Conference[C], AIAA, 1993.
5[8]Mosher T J. Conceptual spacecraft design using a genetic algorithm trade selection process[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 1999,36(1):200-208.
6[9]Rais-Rohani M, Hicks G R. Multidisciplinary design and prototype development of a micro air vehicle[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 1999, 36(1):227-234.
7[10]Prabhat H.Nongradient methods in multidisciplinary design optimization-status and potential[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 1999,36(1): 255-265.
8[11]Sobieszczanski-Sobieski J, Haftka R. Multidisciplinary aerospace design optimization: survey of recent developments[J].Structural Optimization, 1997,14(1): 1-23.
9[12]Kodiyalam S, Vanderplaats G N. Shape optimization of 3D continuum structure via force approximation techniques[J].AIAA Journal, 1989,27(9): 1256-1263.
10[13]Batill S M, Stelmack M A, Sellar R S. Framework for multidisciplinary design based on response-surface approximations[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 1999, 36(1): 287-297.