期刊文献+

一种基于似然极大的动态聚类方法及其应用 被引量:2

A Maximum Likelihood-Based Dynamic Clustering Method and Its Application
下载PDF
导出
摘要 将传统的动态聚类分析和判别分析相结合,引出一种基于似然极大的动态聚类方法,该方法以EM算法实现的极大似然估计进行类参数估计,以相应的贝叶斯后验概率判别个体的归类。模拟研究表明,该方法通常既可无偏估计类参数,又可判别最佳分类个数。与重心法动态聚类和最小组内平方和法动态聚类相比,稳健性较高。同时通过提高判别标准,可以降低误判率。用Fisher的Iris试验数据验证了方法的可行性,并将之成功应用于一个水稻F2群体的个体的主基因基因型鉴别。 Clustering analysis is to determine the intrinsic grouping in a set of unlabeled data. A cluster is a collection of objects which are similar between them and are dissimilar to the objects belonging to other clusters. However, the current clustering techniques have not addressed all the requirements adequately. For instance, dealing with large number of dimensions and large number of data can be problematic because of time complexity. The effectiveness of the distance-based clustering methods depends on the definition of distance ; if an obvious distance measure doesn' t exist we must define it, which is not always easy, especially in multi-dimensional spaces. In addition, the choice of the optimal number of clusters in practice is impossible. Thus, choosing the correct number of clusters and the best clustering method is still a question open to discussion, in order to solve these problems, in this paper, we introduced a maximum likelihood-based dynamic clustering method, which combined the conventional dynamic clustering and discrimination analysis. The parameters of different clusters were estimated by the maximum likelihood method implemented via expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm and the objects were classified by the Bayesian posterior probability. This classified idea could increase the posterior confidence of classified individuals. The results of simulation studies showed that the proposed method not only unbiasedly estimated the corresponding cluster parameters but also differentiated the optimum clustering numbers by Bayesian information criterion (BIC). Compared with the K-means method and the minimum square sum within groups (MinSSw) method, the proposed method was more robustness and had almost the same clustering accuracy as K-means and MinSSw methods. Moreover, the miselassified rate (MR) could be reduced by enhancing the discrimination criterion. However, the unclassified rate (UR) would be increased by enhancing the discrimination criterion. Thus, an eclectic discrimination criterion could be given by the user in order to decrease both MR and UR. The method was validated by a real dataset and the result indicated that the proposed method had a significant advantage on clustering accuracy compared to the K-means and MinSSw methods. An example of the plant height and the number of tiller of F2 population in rice cross Duonieai × Zhonghua 11 was used in the illustration. The results indicated that the genetic difference of these two traits in this cross involves only one pleiotropic major gene. The additive effect and dominance effect of the major gene were estimated as - 24.57 em and 57.12 cm on plant height, and 23.01 and - 25.89 on number of tiller, respectively. The major gene shows overdominance for plant height and near eomplete dominance for number of tillers.
出处 《作物学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2007年第1期70-76,共7页 Acta Agronomica Sinica
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(30270724 30370758) 教育部新世纪优秀人才支持计划项目
关键词 聚类分析 后验概率 贝叶斯信息准则 判别分析 Cluster analysis Posterior probability Bayesian information criterion Discrimination analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献27

  • 1Wylie M P, Holtizman J. The non-line of sight problem in mobile location estimation.In: Pine IEEE ICUPC, Cambridge, MA, 1996, Vol 2. pp 827-831.
  • 2Zhang Y-T(张尧庭), Fang K-T(方开泰).Introduction to Multivariate Statistical Analysis(多元统计分析引论). Beijing: Science Press, 1983. pp 401-457 .
  • 3Johnoson R A, Wichern D W. Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc, 1982. pp 532-560.
  • 4Wu W L, Xiong H, Shekhar S. Clustering and Information Retrieval. Norwell, Mass. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2004.
  • 5Leszczynski J. Computational Materials Science. Amsterdam, Boston: Elsevier, 2004.
  • 6Lee M-L T. Analysis of Microarray Gene Expression Data. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2004.
  • 7Banks D L. Classification, clustering, and data mining applications. In: Proceedings of the Meeting of the International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS) . Chicago: minois Institute of Technology, 2004. pp 15-18.
  • 8Quackenbush J. Computational analysis of microarray data. Nat Rev Genet, 2001, 2:418-427.
  • 9Speed T. Statistical Analysis of Gene Expression Microarray Data. London/Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC Press, 2003.
  • 10MacQueen J B. Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations. In: Proceedings of the 5th Berkeley Symposium, 1967, 1:431-441.

二级参考文献41

共引文献37

同被引文献40

  • 1王威,候本伟,田杰,苏经宇.城市供水管网抗震安全性模糊-随机模拟评价[J].土木工程学报,2013,46(S2):278-281. 被引量:18
  • 2张尧庭 方开泰.多元统计分析引论[M].北京:科学出版社,1983.488.
  • 3顾世梁.实现动态聚类全局最优的一种算法[J].江苏农学院学报,1996,17(1):57-65.
  • 4高惠璇.应用多元统计分析[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2002.
  • 5Wylie M P, Holtizman J. The non-line of sight problem in mobile location estimation//Proc. Fifth IEEE International Conference Universal Personal Communications (ICUPC) , Cambridge, MA, 1996, 2: 827-831.
  • 6Johnoson R A, Wichern D W. Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc, 1982: 532-560.
  • 7Wang S C, Li X L, Tang H Y. Hybrid data clustering based on dependency structure and gibbs sampling. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2006, 4304:1145-1151.
  • 8Quackenbush J. Computational analysis of microarray data. Nature Reviews Genetics, 2001, 2:418-427.
  • 9Speed T. Statistical Analysis of Gene Expression Microarray Data. London/Boca Raton: Chapman and Hall/CRC Press, 2003.
  • 10MacQueen J B. Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations. In." Proceedings of the 5th Berkeley Symposium, 1967, 1: 431-441.

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部