期刊文献+

苦参素与干扰素治疗慢性乙型肝炎的成本-效果分析 被引量:3

Comparison of cost-effectiveness between matrine and interferon in treatment of chronic hepatitis B.
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的分析苦参素和干扰素α-1b治疗慢性乙型肝炎临床疗效,并进行经济学评价,为临床提供有效、实用治疗方案。方法63例慢性乙肝患者,采用随机分苦参素组和干扰素组,分析比较苦参素和干扰素α-1b的治疗成本和治疗效果。结果苦参素和干扰素α-1b治疗慢性乙型肝炎总有效率分别为70.97%和71.83%(P>0.05);成本-效果比分别为57.20和91.58(P<0.05);经敏感度分析所得的成本-效果比分别为45.76和73.26。结论苦参素与干扰素α-1b均能有效治疗慢性乙型肝炎,但前者比后者更经济,更符合药物经济学原则。 Objective To make pharmecoeconmios evaluation of matrlne and Interferon α-1β in treatment of chronic hepatitis B and to offer optimum schedule for clinical treatment. Methods Sixty - three chronic hepatitis B patients were randomly divided into treatment and control groups. Though phammcoeconmic cost - effectiveness analysis, the cost and efficacy of interferonα-1β was compared with matrlne in treatment of 63r chronic hepatitis B. Results The effective rates of matrine and interferon α-1β were 70.97 % and 71.83 % ( P 〉 0. 05) ;the cost - effectiveness ratios were 57.20 and 91.58 respectively ( P 〈 0. 05 ). cest- effectiveness ratios obtained by sensitivity analysis were 45.76 and 73.26 respectively. ConeJwion Matrine is more economical than Interferon α-1β in lreatment of chronic hepatitis B patients.
作者 唐桂莲
出处 《中国热带医学》 CAS 2007年第1期6-7,共2页 China Tropical Medicine
关键词 苦参素 干扰素Α-1B 慢性乙型肝炎 成本-效果分析 Matrine Interferon α-1β Chronic hepatitis B Cost- effectiveness anaiysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献4

共引文献14459

同被引文献43

引证文献3

二级引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部