朝鲜族地区新农村建设与韩国新村运动比较及经验借鉴

A Comparative Study Between the Construction of a New Socialist Countryside in Korean Minority Area and a New Countryside Movement in South Korea and Experience Drawing

朝鲜族地区新农村建设与韩国新村运动既相似又不同,应从韩国借鉴哪些经验?为此,笔者与刚从韩国农村参观考察回来的朝鲜族乡镇领导做了访谈。通过他们在韩国考察的亲身感受,认为朝鲜族地区与韩国农村存在主导思想上的差异、管理体制上的差异、基础设施建设上的差异、农民参与意识上的差异、市场化、商品化程度上等六个方面的差异。通过比较分析,认为当前加强基础设施建设、推进农村体制改革和制度创新、提高农民素质教育、挖掘朝鲜族民俗文化的底蕴,建设集生产生活、旅游休闲为一体的农村社区等措施是朝鲜族地区新农村建设的关键。

There exist both similarities and differences between the construction of a new socialist countryside in Korean minority area and the new countryside movements in South Korea. To make clear what we should learn from new countryside movements in South Korea, the author has had an interview with the township leaders just returning from South Korea investigation. According to their investigation experiences, they think that the differences between Korean minority area and South Korean countryside are manifested in six aspects： the guiding idea, the management system, the infrastructure construction, the farmer＇s consciousness of participation, marketization, and commercialization. Through comparative analyses, the author thinks that the keys to the construction of a new socialist countryside is to attach greater importance to the infrastructure construction in the countryside, to promote the reform and innovation of the system in countryside, to improve the quality education in the countryside, to rediscover Korean folk culture, and build the countryside into a community for living, working, touring, and relaxing.