期刊文献+

Colonic exclusion and combined therapy for refractory constipation 被引量:7

Colonic exclusion and combined therapy for refractory constipation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 AIM: To investigate the therapeutic effectiveness of colonic exclusion and combined therapy for refractory constipation. METHODS: Thirty-two patients with refractory constipation were randomly divided into treatment group (n = 14) and control group (n = 18). Fourteen patients in treatment group underwent colonic exclusion and end-to-side colorectal anastomosis. Eighteen patients in control group received subtotal colectomy and end-to- end colorectal anastomosis. The therapeutic effects of the operations were assessed by comparing the surgical time, incision length, volume of blood losses, hospital stay, recovery rate and complication incidence. All patients received long-term follow-up. RESULTS: All operations were successful and patients recovered fully after the operations. In comparison of treatment group and control group, the surgical time (h), incision length (cm), volume of blood losses (mL), hospital stay (d) were 87 ± 16 min vs 194 ± 23 min (t = 9.85), 10.4 ± 0.5 cm vs 21.2 ± 1.8 cm (t = 14.26), 79.5 ± 31.3 mL vs 286.3 ± 49.2 mL (t = 17.24), and 11.8 ± 2.4 d vs 18.6 ± 2.6 d (t = 6.91), respectively (P < 0.001 for all). The recovery rate and complication incidence were 85.7% vs 88.9% (P = 0.14 > 0.05), 21.4% vs 33.3% (P = 0.73 > 0.05), respectively. CONCLUSION: Colonic exclusion has better therapeutic efficacy on refractory constipation. It has many advantages such as shorter surgical time, smaller incision, fewer blood losses and shorter hospital stay. AIM: To investigate the therapeutic effectiveness of colonic exclusion and combined therapy for refractory constipation. METHODS: Thirty-two patients with refractory constipation were randomly divided into treatment group (n = 14) and control group (n = 18). Fourteen patients in treatment group underwent colonic exclusion and end-to-side colorectal anastomosis. Eighteen patients in control group received subtotal colectomy and end-toend colorectal anastomosis. The therapeutic effects of the operations were assessed by comparing the surgical time, incision length, volume of blood losses, hospital stay, recovery rate and complication incidence. All patients received long-term follow-up. RESULTS: All operations were successful and patients recovered fully after the operations. In comparison of treatment group and control group, the surgical time (h), incision length (cm), volume of blood losses (mL), hospital stay (d) were 87 ± 16 min vs 194 ± 23 min (t = 9.85), 10.4 ± 0.5 cm vs 21.2 ± 1.8 cm (t = 14.26), 79.5 ± 31.3 mL vs 286.3 ± 49.2 mL (t = 17.24), and 11.8 ± 2.4 d vs 18.6 ± 2.6 d (t = 6.91), respectively (P 〈 0.001 for all). The recovery rate and complication incidence were 85.7% vs 88.9% (P = 0.14 〉 0.05), 21.4% vs 33.3% (P = 0.73 〉 0.05), respectively. CONCLUSION: Colonic exclusion has better therapeutic efficacy on refractory constipation. It has many advantages such as shorter surgical time, smaller incision, fewer blood losses and shorter hospital stay.
出处 《World Journal of Gastroenterology》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2006年第48期7864-7868,共5页 世界胃肠病学杂志(英文版)
基金 Supported by the Health Department of Jiangxi Province, No. 20041021
关键词 结肠手术 便秘 治疗 病因 Constipation Colonic exclusion Subtotalcolectomy Quality of life Follow-up
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1[1]Pfeifer J,Agachan F,Wexner SD.Surgery for constipation:a review.Dis Colon Rectum 1996; 39:444-460
  • 2[2]Knowles CH,Martin JE.Slow transit constipation:a model of human gut dysmotility.Review of possible aetiologies.Neurogastroenterol Motil 2000; 12:181-196
  • 3[3]Arce DA,Ermocilla CA,Costa H.Evaluation of constipation.Am Fam Physician 2002; 65:2283-2290
  • 4[4]Bassotti G,Chistolini F,Marinozzi G,Morelli A.Abnormal colonic propagated activity in patients with slow transit constipation and constipation-predominant irritable bowel syndrome.Digestion 2003; 68:178-183
  • 5[5]Platell C,Scache D,Mumme G,Stitz R.A long-term followup of patients undergoing colectomy for chronic idiopathic constipation.Aust N Z J Surg 1996; 66:525-529
  • 6[6]Lundin E,Karlbom U,Pahlman L,Graf W.Outcome of segmental colonic resection for slow-transit constipation.Br J Surg 2002; 89:1270-1274
  • 7[7]Ding SZ.A review and analysis of therapeutic effect about colectomy to treat slow transit constipation.Dachang Gangmen Zazhi 2001; 7:32-33
  • 8[8]FitzHarris GP,Garcia-Aguilar J,Parker SC,Bullard KM,Madoff RD,Goldberg SM,Lowry A.Quality of life after subtotal colectomy for slow-transit constipation:both quality and quantity count.Dis Colon Rectum 2003; 46:433-440

同被引文献18

引证文献7

二级引证文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部