摘要
目的比较复方阿替卡因(必兰)、利多卡因在上颌前牙、前磨牙拔除的麻醉效果。方法选择100例患者的122颗患牙随机分为两组,分别进行局黏膜下(或黏骨膜下)浸润麻醉,对其麻醉注射时及拔牙时的疼痛程度进行比较分析。结果复方阿替卡因局部黏膜下浸润麻醉注射时疼痛明显小于利多卡因(P<0.01),拔牙时疼痛程度小于利多卡因,麻醉良好率为96.77%(P<0.01)。结论复方阿替卡因局部麻醉起效时间快,对组织的浸润性及局部渗透力强,浸润麻醉时安全,效果好,特别适合于普通牙槽外科治疗。
Objective To compare the efficacy of local anesthesia using 4% articaine （primacane） and 2% lidocaine in extraction of teeth. Methods One hundred patients （122 teeth） were selected and divided randomly into two groups. They were applied by submucous infiltration anesthesia or submucoperiosteal anesthesia with articaine or lidocaine respectively. The degree of pain during the injection and extraction of teeth was then observed and analyzed. Results The pain degree of anesthesia using articaine was much slighter than that of lidocaine during the injection and extraction of teeth. The well-anesthesia rate was 96.77 %. Conclusion Articaine is a safe and effective anesthetic medicine for oral surgery.
出处
《临床和实验医学杂志》
2007年第1期42-43,共2页
Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine
关键词
阿替卡因
利多卡因
麻醉
拔牙
Articaine
Lidocaine
Anesthesia
Extraction of teeth
